Federal Court of Appeals Unanimously Rules in Favor of Robert MacLean in A Precedential Decision
After going 24 minutes into overtime of oral arguments on January 4, 2013, on April 26, 2013, a unanimous panel of three United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Judges issued a precedential decision in favor of MacLean. The court ruled that MacLean's disclosure did not violate the law and he may have defenses under the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 (WPA).
| “ |
We agree with Mr. MacLean that the does not “specifically prohibit” the disclosure at issue in this case. The ATSA’s plain language does not expressly prohibit employee disclosures, and only empowers the Agency to prescribe regulations prohibiting disclosure of “if the Secretary decides disclosing the information would . . . be detrimental to public safety.” 49 U.S.C. § 40119(b) (emphasis added). Thus, the ultimate source of prohibition of Mr. MacLean's disclosure is not a statute but a regulation, which the parties agree cannot be 'law' under the WPA. |
” |
For the TSA to sustain its termination of MacLean, it must now attempt to argue that he did not have "a reasonable belief" that there was potential danger. Experts believe it will be close to impossible for the TSA to make such an argument given that the TSA itself admitted that its plan was "a mistake" and cancelled it before every going into effect, and so many prominent leaders of Congress expressed outrage, such as Chuck Schumer, John Kerry, and Hillary Clinton.
Circuit Judge Evan Wallach wrote a separate opinion concurring with his two fellow circuit judges:
| “ |
Mr. MacLean presented substantial evidence that he was not motivated by personal gain but by the desire to protect the public. |
” |
Read more about this topic: Robert Mac Lean
Famous quotes containing the words favor, federal, rules, unanimously, appeals, court and/or decision:
“I wish to reiterate all the reasons which [my predecessor] has presented in favor of the policy of maintaining a strong navy as the best conservator of our peace with other nations and the best means of securing respect for the assertion of our rights of the defense of our interests, and the exercise of our influence in international matters.”
—William Howard Taft (1857–1930)
“The Federal Constitution has stood the test of more than a hundred years in supplying the powers that have been needed to make the Central Government as strong as it ought to be, and with this movement toward uniform legislation and agreements between the States I do not see why the Constitution may not serve our people always.”
—William Howard Taft (1857–1930)
“Those rules of old discovered, not devised,
Are Nature sill, but Nature methodized;
Nature, like liberty, is but restrained
By the same laws which first herself ordained.”
—Alexander Pope (1688–1744)
“Under the dominion of an idea, which possesses the minds of multitudes, as civil freedom, or the religious sentiment, the power of persons are no longer subjects of calculation. A nation of men unanimously bent on freedom, or conquest, can easily confound the arithmetic of statists, and achieve extravagant actions, out of all proportion to their means; as, the Greeks, the Saracens, the Swiss, the Americans, and the French have done.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
“The poetry of heroism appeals irresistibly to those who don’t go to a war, and even more to those whom the war is making enormously wealthy. It’s always so.”
—Louis-Ferdinand Céline (1894–1961)
“As to “Don Juan,” confess ... that it is the sublime of that there sort of writing; it may be bawdy, but is it not good English? It may be profligate, but is it not life, is it not the thing? Could any man have written it who has not lived in the world? and tooled in a post-chaise? in a hackney coach? in a Gondola? against a wall? in a court carriage? in a vis a vis? on a table? and under it?”
—George Gordon Noel Byron (1788–1824)
“The impulse to perfection cannot exist where the definition of perfection is the arbitrary decision of authority. That which is born in loneliness and from the heart cannot be defended against the judgment of a committee of sycophants. The volatile essences which make literature cannot survive the clichés of a long series of story conferences.”
—Raymond Chandler (1888–1959)