Ribet's Theorem - Implication of Fermat's Last Theorem

Implication of Fermat's Last Theorem

Suppose that the Fermat equation with exponent ℓ ≥ 3 had a solution in non-zero integers a, b, c. Let us form the corresponding Frey curve E. It is an elliptic curve and one can show that its discriminant Δ is equal to 16 (abc)2ℓ and its conductor N is the radical of abc, i.e. the product of all distinct primes dividing abc. By the Taniyama–Shimura conjecture, E is a modular elliptic curve. Since N is square-free, by the epsilon conjecture one can perform level descent modulo ℓ. Repeating this procedure, we will eliminate all odd primes from the conductor and reach the modular curve X0(2) of level 2. However, this curve is not an elliptic curve since it has genus zero, resulting in a contradiction.

Read more about this topic:  Ribet's Theorem

Famous quotes containing the word theorem:

    To insure the adoration of a theorem for any length of time, faith is not enough, a police force is needed as well.
    Albert Camus (1913–1960)