Rhombille Tiling - Related Polyhedra and Tilings

Related Polyhedra and Tilings

The rhombille tiling is a part of a set of uniform dual tilings, corresponding to the dual of the trihexagonal tiling.

Uniform hexagonal/triangular tilings
Symmetry:, (*632) +, (632) , (*333) , (3*3)
{6,3} t0,1{6,3} t1{6,3} t1,2{6,3} t2{6,3} t0,2{6,3} t0,1,2{6,3} s{6,3} h{6,3} h1,2{6,3}
Uniform duals
V6.6.6 V3.12.12 V3.6.3.6 V6.6.6 V3.3.3.3.3.3 V3.4.12.4 V.4.6.12 V3.3.3.3.6 V3.3.3.3.3.3

This tiling is a part of a sequence of rhombic polyhedra and tilings with Coxeter group symmetry, starting from the cube, which can be seen as a rhombic hexahedron where the rhombi are squares. The nth element in this sequence has a face configuration of V3.n.3.n.

Dimensional family of quasiregular polyhedra and tilings: 3.n.3.n
Symmetry
*n32
Spherical Euclidean Hyperbolic tiling
*332

Td
*432

Oh
*532

Ih
*632

p6m
*732
*832
*∞32
Quasiregular
figures
configuration

3.3.3.3

3.4.3.4

3.5.3.5

3.6.3.6

3.7.3.7

3.8.3.8

3.∞.3.∞
Coxeter diagram
Dual
(rhombic)
figures
configuration

V3.3.3.3

V3.4.3.4

V3.5.3.5

V3.6.3.6

V3.7.3.7

V3.8.3.8

V3.∞.3.∞
Coxeter diagram

The rhombille tiling is periodic, meaning that it has a two-dimensional group of symmetries, but there also exist aperiodic tilings based on rhombi, notably the Penrose tiling which uses two kinds of rhombi with 36° and 72° acute angles. Another aperiodic tiling, the sphinx tiling, is like the rhombille tiling based on the hexagonal lattice.

The rhombille tiling has *632 symmetry, but vertices can be colored with alternating colors on the inner points leading to a *333 symmetry.

Image
(2 colors)

(3 colors)
Symmetry p6m, (*632) p3m1, ], (*333)
Coxeter

Read more about this topic:  Rhombille Tiling

Famous quotes containing the word related:

    A parent who from his own childhood experience is convinced of the value of fairy tales will have no difficulty in answering his child’s questions; but an adult who thinks these tales are only a bunch of lies had better not try telling them; he won’t be able to related them in a way which would enrich the child’s life.
    Bruno Bettelheim (20th century)