Motion Along The Line of Sight
Assume the observer and the source are moving away from each other with a relative velocity ( is negative if the observer and the source are moving toward each other). Considering the problem in the reference frame of the source, suppose one wavefront arrives at the observer. The next wavefront is then at a distance away from him (where is the wavelength, is the frequency of the wave the source emitted, and is the speed of light). Since the wavefront moves with velocity and the observer escapes with velocity, the time (as measured in the reference frame of the source) between crest arrivals at the observer is
where is the velocity of the observer in terms of the speed of light (see beta (velocity)).
Due to the relativistic time dilation, the observer will measure this time to be
where
is the Lorentz factor. The corresponding observed frequency is
The ratio
is called the Doppler factor of the source relative to the observer. (This terminology is particularly prevalent in the subject of astrophysics: see relativistic beaming.) The corresponding wavelengths are related by
and the resulting redshift
can be written as
In the non-relativistic limit (when ) this redshift can be approximated by
corresponding to the classical Doppler effect.
Read more about this topic: Relativistic Doppler Effect
Famous quotes containing the words motion, line and/or sight:
“The motion picture made in Hollywood, if it is to create art at all, must do so within such strangling limitations of subject and treatment that it is a blind wonder it ever achieves any distinction beyond the purely mechanical slickness of a glass and chromium bathroom.”
—Raymond Chandler (1888–1959)
“For as the interposition of a rivulet, however small, will occasion the line of the phalanx to fluctuate, so any trifling disagreement will be the cause of seditions; but they will not so soon flow from anything else as from the disagreement between virtue and vice, and next to that between poverty and riches.”
—Aristotle (384–322 B.C.)
“No one thinks anything silly is suitable when they are an adolescent. Such an enormous share of their own behavior is silly that they lose all proper perspective on silliness, like a baker who is nauseated by the sight of his own eclairs. This provides another good argument for the emerging theory that the best use of cryogenics is to freeze all human beings when they are between the ages of twelve and nineteen.”
—Anna Quindlen (20th century)