Relativistic Doppler Effect - Motion Along The Line of Sight

Motion Along The Line of Sight

Assume the observer and the source are moving away from each other with a relative velocity ( is negative if the observer and the source are moving toward each other). Considering the problem in the reference frame of the source, suppose one wavefront arrives at the observer. The next wavefront is then at a distance away from him (where is the wavelength, is the frequency of the wave the source emitted, and is the speed of light). Since the wavefront moves with velocity and the observer escapes with velocity, the time (as measured in the reference frame of the source) between crest arrivals at the observer is

where is the velocity of the observer in terms of the speed of light (see beta (velocity)).

Due to the relativistic time dilation, the observer will measure this time to be

where

is the Lorentz factor. The corresponding observed frequency is

The ratio

is called the Doppler factor of the source relative to the observer. (This terminology is particularly prevalent in the subject of astrophysics: see relativistic beaming.) The corresponding wavelengths are related by

and the resulting redshift

can be written as

In the non-relativistic limit (when ) this redshift can be approximated by

corresponding to the classical Doppler effect.

Read more about this topic:  Relativistic Doppler Effect

Famous quotes containing the words motion, line and/or sight:

    Wine gives a man nothing. It neither gives him knowledge nor wit; it only animates a man, and enables him to bring out what a dread of the company has repressed. It only puts in motion what had been locked up in frost.
    Samuel Johnson (1709–1784)

    A line in long array, where they wind betwixt green islands;
    They take a serpentine course—their arms flash in the sun—hark to the musical clank;
    Walt Whitman (1819–1892)

    The infant’s first social achievement, then, is his willingness to let the mother out of sight without undue anxiety or rage, because she has become an inner certainty as well as an outer predictability.
    Erik H. Erikson (1904–1994)