Proof
The lower bound follows by applying the upper bound to
Therefore, it suffices to prove the upper bound. Since there are only finitely many permutations, there exists at least one for which
is maximal. In case there are several permutations with this property, let σ denote one with the highest number of fixed points.
We will now prove by contradiction, that σ has to be the identity (then we are done). Assume that σ is not the identity. Then there exists a j in {1, ..., n − 1} such that σ(j) ≠ j and σ(i) = i for all i in {1, ..., j − 1}. Hence σ(j) > j and there exists k in {j + 1, ..., n} with σ(k) = j. Now
Therefore,
Expanding this product and rearranging gives
hence the permutation
which arises from σ by exchanging the values σ(j) and σ(k), has at least one additional fixed point compared to σ, namely at j, and also attains the maximum. This contradicts the choice of σ.
If
then we have strict inequalities at (1), (2), and (3), hence the maximum can only be attained by the identity, any other permutation σ cannot be optimal.
Read more about this topic: Rearrangement Inequality
Famous quotes containing the word proof:
“From whichever angle one looks at it, the application of racial theories remains a striking proof of the lowered demands of public opinion upon the purity of critical judgment.”
—Johan Huizinga (18721945)
“Right and proof are two crutches for everything bent and crooked that limps along.”
—Franz Grillparzer (17911872)
“If any proof were needed of the progress of the cause for which I have worked, it is here tonight. The presence on the stage of these college women, and in the audience of all those college girls who will some day be the nations greatest strength, will tell their own story to the world.”
—Susan B. Anthony (18201906)

