Ranks of The AAFC - Rank Establishments

Rank Establishments

The AAFC has specific rank establishments depending on the strength of a squadron. This is to ensure a balance between leadership roles and subordinates members (especially to prevent a top-heavy squadron developing). As an exaggerated example, it would not be beneficial for a squadron of 40 cadets to have 39 CUOs and 1 CDT, nor would it be beneficial for it to have 20 CWOFFs, 10 CFSGTs and 10 CSGTs. Rather, that squadron ought to have 2 CUOs, 2 CWOFFs, 1 CFSGT, 3 CSGTs, 5 CCPLs and around 30 LCDTs/CDTs. The general standard is 1-4 NCOs and CUOs.

The following table outlines cadet establishments for AAFC squadrons:

Cadet Ranks of the AAFC
SQN Cadet Establishment CUO CWOFF CFSGT CSGT CCPL
10-30 1 2 1 2 4
31-40 2 2 1 3 5
41-50 3 2 2 3 6
51-60 3 2 2 4 7
61-70 4 2 2 5 9
71-80 4 3 3 5 10
81-90 4 3 3 6 11
91-100 5 3 3 7 12
101-110 5 3 4 7 13
111-120 5 4 4 8 14
121-130 5 4 4 9 16
131-140 6 4 5 9 17
141-150 6 4 5 10 18
  • Squadrons cannot exceed the establishment of CUO and CWOFF positions, positions for CUOs do not trickle down to CWOFF positions if there are vacancies in CUO positions.
  • The rank establishment system has a trickle-down effect. This means that, for example, a squadron with no CUOs/CWOFFs can assign those positions to subordinate personnel, so long as the total number does not exceed the normal number plus the vacant senior positions. There is no cascade-up effect and CUO positions do not trickle down to allow for more CWOFFs, but do trickle down to allow for more CFSGT positions.
  • This means that vacant CCPL positions remain that way at all times, and, for example, a squadron with establishment for 75 cadets that has only 3 CSGTs could not assign those positions to CUO/CWOFF/CFSGT rank but could assign them to allow for more CCPLs.

Read more about this topic:  Ranks Of The AAFC

Famous quotes containing the word rank:

    In a famous Middletown study of Muncie, Indiana, in 1924, mothers were asked to rank the qualities they most desire in their children. At the top of the list were conformity and strict obedience. More than fifty years later, when the Middletown survey was replicated, mothers placed autonomy and independence first. The healthiest parenting probably promotes a balance of these qualities in children.
    Richard Louv (20th century)