Ramanujan Summation - Sum of Divergent Series

Sum of Divergent Series

Using standard extensions for known divergent series, he calculated "Ramanujan summation" of those. In particular, the sum of 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ⋯ is

where the notation indicates Ramanujan summation. This formula originally appeared in one of Ramanujan's notebooks, without any notation to indicate that it was a Ramanujan summation.

For even powers we have:

and for odd powers we have a relation with the Bernoulli numbers:

Those values are consistent with the Riemann zeta function.

More recently, the use of C(1) has been proposed as Ramanujan's summation, since then it can be assured that one series admits one and only one Ramanujan's summation, defined as the value in 1 of the only solution of the difference equation that verifies the condition .

This new definition of Ramanujan's summation (denoted as ) does not coincide with the earlier defined Ramanujan's summation, C(0), nor with the summation of convergent series, but it has interesting properties, such as: If R(x) tends to a finite limit when x → +1, then the series is convergent, and we have

In particular we have:

where γ is the Euler–Mascheroni constant.

Ramanujan resummation can be extended to integrals for example using the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula one can write

\begin{align} I(n, \Lambda) &= \frac{n}{2}I(n-1, \Lambda) + \zeta(-n) - \sum_{r=1}^{\infty}\frac{B_{2r}}{(2r)!} a_{n,r}(n-2r+1) I(n-2r, \Lambda)\\ a_{n,r} &= \frac{\Gamma(n+1)}{\Gamma (n - 2r + 2)} \end{align}

here with the application of this Ramanujan resummation lends to finite results in the renormalization of Quantum Field theories

Read more about this topic:  Ramanujan Summation

Famous quotes containing the words sum of, sum and/or series:

    “We didn’t come to dig in Egypt for medals. Much more is learned from studying bits of broken pottery than from all the sensational finds. Our job is to increase the sum of human knowledge of the past, not to satisfy our own curiosity.”
    —John L. Balderston (1899–1954)

    “To sum up our most serious objections in a few words, we should say that Carlyle indicates a depth—and we mean not impliedly, but distinctly—which he neglects to fathom.”
    —Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    “There is in every either-or a certain naivete which may well befit the evaluator, but ill- becomes the thinker, for whom opposites dissolve in series of transitions.”
    —Robert Musil (1880–1942)