Cases Where Consent Has Not Been Given
In 1999, Queen Elizabeth II, acting on the advice of the Government, refused to signify her consent to Parliament debating the Military Action Against Iraq (Parliamentary Approval) Bill, which sought to transfer from the Sovereign to Parliament the power to authorize military strikes against Iraq. Due to the Crown's refusal to consent to the Bill's debate, it was automatically dropped. This Bill would have removed from the Prime Minister the power to declare war by the use of the Sovereign's prerogative power, and so Prime Minister Tony Blair advised the Queen to refuse consent.
In 1998, the Palace of Westminster (Removal of Crown Immunity) Bill could not be debated because Queen's consent had not been given.
In 1990, the Reform of the House of Lords Bill could not be debated because Queen's consent had not been given.
These cases show that Queen's Consent is a valuable tool for the Government of the day where backbench Members of Parliament (including members of the same party as the Government) have sought to have Private Members' Bills debated and voted on in Parliament that the Prime Minister and the Cabinet feel would be awkward or embarrassing for the Government, or might lead to a significant number of backbench Members belonging to the same party as the Government voting against the Cabinet's views, undermining the Government's authority. In such a situation, the Government can advise the Queen to refuse consent to debate a Bill that affects her prerogatives.
Read more about this topic: Queen's Consent
Famous quotes containing the words cases and/or consent:
“In most cases a favorite writer is more with us in his book than he ever could have been in the flesh; since, being a writer, he is one who has studied and perfected this particular mode of personal incarnation, very likely to the detriment of any other. I should like as a matter of curiosity to see and hear for a moment the men whose works I admire; but I should hardly expect to find further intercourse particularly profitable.”
—Charles Horton Cooley (1864–1929)
“To exist is equivalent to an act of faith, a protest against the truth, an interminable prayer.... As soon as they consent to live, the unbeliever and the man of faith are fundamentally the same, since both have made the only decision that defines a being.”
—E.M. Cioran (b. 1911)