Definition
Suppose ƒ:D → D′ where D and D′ are two domains in C. There are a variety of equivalent definitions, depending on the required smoothness of ƒ. If ƒ is assumed to have continuous partial derivatives, then ƒ is quasiconformal provided it satisfies the Beltrami equation
-
(1)
for some complex valued Lebesgue measurable μ satisfying sup |μ| < 1 (Bers 1977). This equation admits a geometrical interpretation. Equip D with the metric tensor
where Ω(z) > 0. Then ƒ satisfies (1) precisely when it is a conformal transformation from D equipped with this metric to the domain D′ equipped with the standard Euclidean metric. The function ƒ is then called μ-conformal. More generally, the continuous differentiability of ƒ can be replaced by the weaker condition that ƒ be in the Sobolev space W1,2(D) of functions whose first-order distributional derivatives are in L2(D). In this case, ƒ is required to be a weak solution of (1). When μ is zero almost everywhere, any homeomorphism in W1,2(D) that is a weak solution of (1) is conformal.
Without appeal to an auxiliary metric, consider the effect of the pullback under ƒ of the usual Euclidean metric. The resulting metric is then given by
which, relative to the background Euclidean metric, has eigenvalues
The eigenvalues represent, respectively, the squared length of the major and minor axis of the ellipse obtained by pulling back along f the unit circle in the tangent plane.
Accordingly, the dilatation of ƒ at a point z is defined by
The (essential) supremum of K(z) is given by
and is called the dilatation of ƒ.
A definition based on the notion of extremal length is as follows. If there is a finite K such that for every collection Γ of curves in D the extremal length of Γ is at most K times the extremal length of { ƒ o γ : γ ∈ Γ }. Then ƒ is K-quasiconformal.
If ƒ is K-quasiconformal for some finite K, then ƒ is quasiconformal.
Read more about this topic: Quasiconformal Mapping
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“... we all know the wags definition of a philanthropist: a man whose charity increases directly as the square of the distance.”
—George Eliot [Mary Ann (or Marian)
“Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
—Walter Pater (18391894)
“Perhaps the best definition of progress would be the continuing efforts of men and women to narrow the gap between the convenience of the powers that be and the unwritten charter.”
—Nadine Gordimer (b. 1923)