Parent/child Relationships
By a result of Berggren (1934), all primitive Pythagorean triples can be generated from the (3, 4, 5) triangle by using the three linear transformations T1, T2, T3 below, where a, b, c are sides of a triple:
new side a | new side b | new side c | |
T1: | a − 2b + 2c | 2a − b + 2c | 2a − 2b + 3c |
T2: | a + 2b + 2c | 2a + b + 2c | 2a + 2b + 3c |
T3: | −a + 2b + 2c | −2a + b + 2c | −2a + 2b + 3c |
If one begins with 3, 4, 5 then all other primitive triples will eventually be produced. In other words, every primitive triple will be a “parent” to 3 additional primitive triples. Starting from the initial node with a = 3, b = 4, and c = 5, the next generation of triples is
new side a | new side b | new side c |
3 − (2×4) + (2×5) = 5 | (2×3) − 4 + (2×5) = 12 | (2×3) − (2×4) + (3×5) = 13 |
3 + (2×4) + (2×5) = 21 | (2×3) + 4 + (2×5) = 20 | (2×3) + (2×4) + (3×5) = 29 |
−3 + (2×4) + (2×5) = 15 | −(2×3) + 4 + (2×5) = 8 | −(2×3) + (2×4) + (3×5) = 17 |
The linear transformations T1, T2, and T3 have a geometric interpretation in the language of quadratic forms. They are closely related to (but are not equal to) reflections generating the orthogonal group of x2 + y2 − z2 over the integers. A different set of three linear transformations is discussed in Pythagorean triples by use of matrices and_linear transformations. For further discussion of parent-child relationships in triples, see: Pythagorean triple (Wolfram) and (Alperin 2005).
Read more about this topic: Pythagorean Triple
Famous quotes containing the words parent and/or child:
“Verily the kindness that gazes upon itself in a mirror turns to stone,
And a good deed that calls itself by tender names becomes the parent to a curse.”
—Kahlil Gibran (18831931)
“Uncertainty about the outcome is a given in child rearing and not a reflection of a mothers inadequacy. She should not be misled by her wish to be omnipotent, all-powerful, all-giving, the perfect mother, who will right all the wrongs and make up for all the deprivations of her own childhood. She is simply an imperfect human being with needs of her own.”
—Elaine Heffner (20th century)