Portuguese Conquest of The Jaffna Kingdom - Client State

Client State

Part of a series on
Sri Lankan
Tamil people ஈழத் தமிழர்
History
  • Eelam
  • Jaffna kingdom
  • Vannimai
  • Eastern Tamils
  • Aryacakravarti
  • Vanniar
  • Demala Pattuva
  • Portuguese conquest
Culture
  • Dance
  • Dress
  • Literature
  • Media
  • Music
Religion
  • Hinduism
  • Catholicism
  • Protestantism
Society
  • Karaiyar
  • Koviar
  • Mukkuvar
  • Nalavar
  • Panchamar
  • Paraiyar
  • Vellalar
  • Vedar
Languages and dialects
  • Negombo Tamil
  • Jaffna Tamil
  • Batticaloa Tamil
Politics
  • ACTC
  • FP
  • TNA
  • TULF
  • Tamil Eelam
  • Militancy
  • LTTE
  • Civil war
  • Killing fields
  • IDP camps
  • PTGTE
Diaspora
  • Australia
  • Canada
  • France
  • Germany
  • India
  • Malaysia
  • United Kingdom
  • United States

The first expedition, led by Viceroy Dom Constantino de Bragança in 1560, failed to subdue the kingdom but captured Mannar Island. Although the circumstances are unclear, by 1582 the Jaffna king was paying a tribute to the Portuguese of ten elephants or an equivalent in cash. In 1591, during the second expedition, led by André Furtado de Mendonça, King Puvirasa Pandaram was killed and his son Ethirimanna Cinkam was installed as the monarch. This arrangement gave the Catholic missionaries freedom of action and monopoly in elephant export to the Portuguese, which the incumbent king, however, resisted. He helped the Kandyan kingdom under kings Vimaladharmasuriya I and Senarat (1604–35) during the period 1593–1635 with the intent of securing help from South India to resist the Portuguese. He, however, maintained autonomy of the kingdom without overtly provoking the Portuguese.

Read more about this topic:  Portuguese Conquest Of The Jaffna Kingdom

Famous quotes containing the words client and/or state:

    A client is to me a mere unit, a factor in a problem.
    Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859–1930)

    I do not think that there is any doubt about where I stand in respect to boycotts. If there is, I will just state what I think about them. They are illegal and ought to be suppressed. I would never countenance that which recognizes their legality.
    William Howard Taft (1857–1930)