Plautdietsch Language - Status

Status

There is disagreement whether Plautdietsch is a language or a dialect. Some classify it as a dialect of Low German (Plattdüütsch) based on mutual intelligibility. Others classify it as a language based on socio-linguistic reasons.

Arguments for a dialect:

  1. It is primarily a spoken, not written language;
  2. It shares grammatical and lexical similarities with other varieties of Low German;
  3. It is intelligible to other Low German speakers after some acquaintance;
  4. Until at least 1750 it was in strict contact with the other Low German dialects along the North Sea and Baltic coasts, forming a consistent dialectal continuum of one proper language. (Saxon/Low German)

Arguments for classifying it as a language of its own:

  1. It has many developments and sound shifts not found in any other Low German dialect;
  2. It has many borrowings from other languages completely adapted into Plautdietsch phonetics, which would not be understood by a speaker of other dialects;
  3. It has many idiomatic expressions of its own and usages of particular words different from the ones in Northern (Low Saxon, Mecklenburgic) and Southern (Westphalian, Eastphalian, Märkisch) Low German. Many idiomatic expressions of Northern/Southern Low German are not used nor understood by a Plautdietsch speaker.

Read more about this topic:  Plautdietsch Language

Famous quotes containing the word status:

    “As a work of art it has the same status as a long conversation between two not very bright drunks.”
    —Clive James (b. 1939)

    “screenwriter
    Policemen so cherish their status as keepers of the peace and protectors of the public that they have occasionally been known to beat to death those citizens or groups who question that status.”
    —David Mamet (b. 1947)

    “What is clear is that Christianity directed increased attention to childhood. For the first time in history it seemed important to decide what the moral status of children was. In the midst of this sometimes excessive concern, a new sympathy for children was promoted. Sometimes this meant criticizing adults. . . . So far as parents were put on the defensive in this way, the beginning of the Christian era marks a revolution in the child’s status.”
    —C. John Sommerville (20th century)