Perfect Number - Minor Results

Minor Results

All even perfect numbers have a very precise form; odd perfect numbers either do not exist or are rare. There are a number of results on perfect numbers that are actually quite easy to prove but nevertheless superficially impressive; some of them also come under Richard Guy's strong law of small numbers:

  • An odd perfect number is not divisible by 105.
  • Every odd perfect number is of the form N ≡ 1 (mod 12), N ≡ 117 (mod 468), or N ≡ 81 (mod 324).
  • The only even perfect number of the form x3 + 1 is 28 (Makowski 1962).
  • 28 is also the only even perfect number that is a sum of two positive integral cubes (Gallardo 2010).
  • The reciprocals of the divisors of a perfect number N must add up to 2:
    • For 6, we have ;
    • For 28, we have, etc. (This is particularly easy to see, just by taking the definition of a perfect number, and dividing both sides by n.)
  • The number of divisors of a perfect number (whether even or odd) must be even, because N cannot be a perfect square.
    • From these two results it follows that every perfect number is an Ore's harmonic number.
  • The even perfect numbers are not trapezoidal numbers; that is, they cannot be represented as the difference of two positive non-consecutive triangular numbers. There are only three types of non-trapezoidal numbers: even perfect numbers, powers of two, and a class of numbers formed from Fermat primes in a similar way to the construction of even perfect numbers from Mersenne primes.
  • The number of perfect numbers less than n is less than, where c > 0 is a constant. In fact it is, using little-o notation.

Read more about this topic:  Perfect Number

Famous quotes containing the words minor and/or results:

    To minor authors is left the ornamentation of the commonplace: these do not bother about any reinventing of the world; they merely try to squeeze the best they can out of a given order of things, out of traditional patterns of fiction.
    Vladimir Nabokov (1899–1977)

    The study and knowledge of the universe would somehow be lame and defective were no practical results to follow.
    Marcus Tullius Cicero (106–43 B.C.)