Perfect Number - Minor Results

Minor Results

All even perfect numbers have a very precise form; odd perfect numbers either do not exist or are rare. There are a number of results on perfect numbers that are actually quite easy to prove but nevertheless superficially impressive; some of them also come under Richard Guy's strong law of small numbers:

  • An odd perfect number is not divisible by 105.
  • Every odd perfect number is of the form N ≡ 1 (mod 12), N ≡ 117 (mod 468), or N ≡ 81 (mod 324).
  • The only even perfect number of the form x3 + 1 is 28 (Makowski 1962).
  • 28 is also the only even perfect number that is a sum of two positive integral cubes (Gallardo 2010).
  • The reciprocals of the divisors of a perfect number N must add up to 2:
    • For 6, we have ;
    • For 28, we have, etc. (This is particularly easy to see, just by taking the definition of a perfect number, and dividing both sides by n.)
  • The number of divisors of a perfect number (whether even or odd) must be even, because N cannot be a perfect square.
    • From these two results it follows that every perfect number is an Ore's harmonic number.
  • The even perfect numbers are not trapezoidal numbers; that is, they cannot be represented as the difference of two positive non-consecutive triangular numbers. There are only three types of non-trapezoidal numbers: even perfect numbers, powers of two, and a class of numbers formed from Fermat primes in a similar way to the construction of even perfect numbers from Mersenne primes.
  • The number of perfect numbers less than n is less than, where c > 0 is a constant. In fact it is, using little-o notation.

Read more about this topic:  Perfect Number

Famous quotes containing the words minor and/or results:

    There are acacias, a graceful species amusingly devitalized by sentimentality, this kind drooping its leaves with the grace of a young widow bowed in controllable grief, this one obscuring them with a smooth silver as of placid tears. They please, like the minor French novelists of the eighteenth century, by suggesting a universe in which nothing cuts deep.
    Rebecca West (1892–1983)

    ... dependence upon material possessions inevitably results in the destruction of human character.
    Agnes E. Meyer (1887–1970)