Raising Agenetics As Females
People with either penile agenesis or testicular agenesis, but not both, usually continue as males throughout their lives. Historically, people with both penile and testicular agenesis were raised as females and eventually underwent sex reassignment surgery, despite having a normal 46,XY male karyotype and no female sexual characteristics. This practice was controversial, and many individuals decided to live as males again when they reached puberty or their early twenties. The New Zealand sexologist John Money was the principle theorist who argued that boys born without an "adequate" penis, or who lost their penis in an accident, should be raised as sex reassigned girls. The book As Nature Made Him chronicles the disastrous results of the application of Money's theories in the Bruce/Brenda case. The anatomy underlying the failure of these cases is not well understood. In most males, the development of the embryo into a female is prevented by Anti-Müllerian hormones. These hormones are commonly believed to be created in the testes, but they nevertheless still appear to be produced in male embryos lacking testes.
Read more about this topic: Penile Agenesis And Testicular Agenesis
Famous quotes containing the words raising and/or females:
“In considering the ledger equal, understand the greatest gift you have given your parents is the opportunity to raise you. The things a child gets from parents can’t compare to the things a parent gets from raising a child. Only by experiencing this can you understand the degree to which children give meaning to parents’ lives.”
—Frank Pittman (20th century)
“Most young black females learn to be suspicious and critical of feminist thinking long before they have any clear understanding of its theory and politics.... Without rigorously engaging feminist thought, they insist that racial separatism works best. This attitude is dangerous. It not only erases the reality of common female experience as a basis for academic study; it also constructs a framework in which differences cannot be examined comparatively.”
—bell hooks (b. c. 1955)