Password Synchronization - Security

Security

Password synchronization is generally considered to be a relatively crude approach that is inherently less secure than well-designed and implemented single signon or password vault solutions. If the single, synchronized password is compromised (for example, if it is guessed, disclosed, determined by cryptanalysis from one of the systems, intercepted on an insecure communications path, or if the user is socially engineered into resetting it to a known value), all the systems that share that password are vulnerable to improper access. In most single signon and password vault solutions, compromise of the primary or master password (in other words, the password used to unlock access to the individual unique passwords used on other systems) also compromises all the associated systems, so of course that password must be strong and well protected in the same way. However, compromise of any individual password used on a given system does not automatically allow access to the single signon system, the password vault or the other systems, thereby limiting the impact.

Depending on the software used, password synchronization may be triggered by a password change on any one of the synchronized systems (whether initiated by the user or by password expiry on the system) and/or by the user initiating the change centrally through the software, perhaps through a web interface.

Some password synchronization systems directly reset the stored representations of the password rather than the actual password. This approach is typically only found in proprietary systems where the password storage schemes are standardized, for example provided by a single vendor. Either way, it is clearly important to reset and distribute the password or stored representations in a secure manner.

Read more about this topic:  Password Synchronization

Famous quotes containing the word security:

    “Thanks to recent trends in the theory of knowledge, history is now better aware of its own worth and unassailability than it formerly was. It is precisely in its inexact character, in the fact that it can never be normative and does not have to be, that its security lies.”
    —Johan Huizinga (1872–1945)

    “I feel a sincere wish indeed to see our government brought back to it’s republican principles, to see that kind of government firmly fixed, to which my whole life has been devoted. I hope we shall now see it so established, as that when I retire, it may be under full security that we are to continue free and happy.”
    —Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826)

    “The three great ends which a statesman ought to propose to himself in the government of a nation, are,—1. Security to possessors; 2. Facility to acquirers; and, 3. Hope to all.”
    —Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772–1834)