Writing System
Pashto employs the Pashto alphabet, a modified form of the Persian alphabet which on its part is derived from the Arabic alphabet. The reason for this is that it is not a Semitic language, and thus it is modified. It has extra letters for Pashto-specific sounds. Since the 17th century Pashto has been primarily written in the Naskh script, rather than the Nasta'liq script used for neighboring Persian and Urdu languages. The Pashto alphabet consists of 44 letters, and 4 diacritic marks. The following table gives the letters' isolated forms, along with the Latin equivalents and the IPA values for the letters' typical sounds:
| ا ā, nothing /ɑ, ʔ/ |
ب b /b/ |
پ p /p/ |
ت t /t̪/ |
ټ ṭ /ʈ/ |
ث s /s/ |
ج j /d͡ʒ/ |
ځ ź /d͡z/ |
چ č /t͡ʃ/ |
څ c /t͡s/ |
ح h /h/ |
خ x /x/ |
| د d /d̪/ |
ډ ḍ /ɖ/ |
ﺫ z /z/ |
ﺭ r /r/ |
ړ ṛ /ɺ˞~ɻ/ |
ﺯ z /z/ |
ژ ž /ʒ/ |
ږ ǵ (or ẓ̌) /ʐ, ʝ, ɡ/ |
س s /s/ |
ش š /ʃ/ |
ښ x̌ (or ṣ̌) /ʂ, ç, x/ |
|
| ص s /s/ |
ض z /z/ |
ط t /t̪/ |
ظ z /z/ |
ع nothing /ʔ/ |
غ ğ /ɣ/ |
ف f /f/ |
ق q /q/ |
ک k /k/ |
ګ g /ɡ/ |
ل l /l/ |
|
| م m /m/ |
ن n /n/ |
ڼ ṇ /ɳ/ |
و w, ū, o /w, u, o/ |
ه h, a, ə /h, a, ə/ |
ي y, ī /j, i/ |
ې e /e/ |
ی ay, y /ai, j/ |
ۍ əi /əi/ |
ئ əi, y /əi, j/ |
Pashto is written from right to left.
Read more about this topic: Pashto Language
Famous quotes containing the words writing and/or system:
“One can write out of love or hate. Hate tells one a great deal about a person. Love makes one become the person. Love, contrary to legend, is not half as blind, at least for writing purposes, as hate. Love can see the evil and not cease to be love. Hate cannot see the good and remain hate. The writer, writing out of hatred, will, thus, paint a far more partial picture than if he had written out of love.”
—Jessamyn West (1902–1984)
“Exploitation and oppression is not a matter of race. It is the system, the apparatus of world-wide brigandage called imperialism, which made the Powers behave the way they did. I have no illusions on this score, nor do I believe that any Asian nation or African nation, in the same state of dominance, and with the same system of colonial profit-amassing and plunder, would have behaved otherwise.”
—Han Suyin (b. 1917)