Parent-teacher Interview - Booking Methods For Parent Teacher Interviews

Booking Methods For Parent Teacher Interviews

One of the main barriers to attendance is the presence of and effectiveness of some kind of booking system.

  • Some schools have a Free-for-all approach where parents just turn up and line up to see each teacher they want to see, an exercise that can be very frustrating and time-consuming for parents.
  • Other schools provide bookings via phone or in person at the school administration office, but this creates a "traffic jam" of people and/or phone calls.
  • Most schools have traditionally used the manual, piece of paper system where students are given a booking sheet which they take around to their teachers. Teachers have their own booking sheet and they allocate times that are still available to each student, marking the time on both sheets. Parents usually have the option of indicating which teachers they wish to see and the preferred times. While this manual system has been widely used for many years it has several major drawbacks that significantly reduce its effectiveness and create a drain on school resources:
  • Teachers are already very busy and are usually required to make bookings with students during break times. Teachers who want (or need) to preserve their break times end up by necessity avoiding students, so students are unable to see the teachers they need to see and parents don't get the bookings they need.
  • Parents don't have direct access to the teachers' free time list and often get times that aren't suitable or optimal. Booking schedules are controlled and therefore optimised from the point of view of the teacher, not the parent. This apparent optimisation ignores the fundamental fact that it is the parent (not the school) who knows when he/she is available to attend the event.
  • The whole process relies on the students to do the booking, so if a student doesn't want his/her parent to see teachers, all he/she has to do is not make bookings, or leave it so late that there are no times available. Many parents don't even know about the event or find out about it after it's all over.
  • It is difficult or impossible to measure the effectiveness of the event via any statistics or analysis.
  • On-line booking systems have become more widely available as internet access and usage becomes pervasive. Schools who implement an on-line booking system often see even greater demand than usual as many parents are now able to make bookings who were previously hindered simply by the ineffective or non-existent booking process. This can place extra strain on the logistics of the event, for example, how long teachers should be available after hours. However it is generally viewed as advantageous if this time is well-used meeting with parents rather than being sparsely attended and hence wasting much valuable time. A well-designed on-line booking will as a minimum be secure, easy to use and easy to manage. Features offered by more advanced systems include:
  • Optimised bookings where the system chooses the best sequence of times to allow the parent to see the required teachers within an overall time-frame that is suitable to the parent, rather than the parent simply choosing individual times to see teachers (although the latter method should always be available).
  • Flexible schedules for interviews. Schools often required interviews over multiple days, based on year/grade, boarder/day students or other factors. There may even be a need for different length interviews for different grades/classes/days.
  • Regular space time slots for teachers that allow meetings to get back on schedule if required.
  • Spacer time slots or an optional 'gaps' setting that allow parents to prevent back-to-back bookings, thus helping on-time-running of interviews (parents have time to get to the next interview on time).
  • Missed bookings where a parent can indicate to the school that he/she wanted to see a certain teacher but couldn't, either because the teacher was fully booked or none of the remaining available times was suitable. This allows the school to capture this information to help better manage subsequent interview events, and to contact parents where necessary.
  • Statistical analysis of bookings allowing optimisation of the booking process during the booking period, and analysis after interviews have completed.
  • Centrally scheduled booking systems (batch scheduled). These systems shift control of the booking process to a certain extent away from parents and back to the school with a priority-based, multi-phase process. Parents place booking requests on-line for the teachers they want to see (in order of their priority), together with their time availability. The school / software then schedules all requests as a whole. This results in parents getting to see their top priority teachers, but potentially missing out on 'lower-priority' bookings. This is trade-of is in contrast to first-in-first-served on-line bookings, where early booking parents get the bookings they need and those bookings are 'locked-in'. Once the overall batch produced interview schedule is published by the school—i.e. the school must relay this information securely to all parents, telling them which interviews they did and didn't get. Parents may then go on-line for a second round of bookings to make changes or (new) late bookings, or presumably to try to book those low-priority teachers they missed out on in the first round. Centrally scheduled systems also claim to improve the issue of core subject teachers being always over booked, as a parent priority system means these teachers are only booked out by 'high level' parent priority requests, but the end result can be overly complex for both schools to manage, and for parents who first have to prioritise one teacher over another (when they are all 'important') and then go through multiple phases of bookings and communication with the school.

Read more about this topic:  Parent-teacher Interview

Famous quotes containing the words methods, parent, teacher and/or interviews:

    The comparison between Coleridge and Johnson is obvious in so far as each held sway chiefly by the power of his tongue. The difference between their methods is so marked that it is tempting, but also unnecessary, to judge one to be inferior to the other. Johnson was robust, combative, and concrete; Coleridge was the opposite. The contrast was perhaps in his mind when he said of Johnson: “his bow-wow manner must have had a good deal to do with the effect produced.”
    Virginia Woolf (1882–1941)

    This is the hope of many adolescent girls—to capture a parent’s heart with love for them as they are, as people. They reject the notion of being loved just because they are the child of the parent. They want the parent to fall in love with them all over again, because being new, they deserve a new love.
    Terri Apter (20th century)

    Mothers seem to be in subtle competition with teachers. There is always an underlying fear that teachers will do a better job than they have done with their child.... But mostly mothers feel that their areas of competence are very much similar to those of the teacher. In fact they feel they know their child better than anyone else and that the teacher doesn’t possess any special field of authority or expertise.
    Sara Lawrence Lightfoot (20th century)

    If the justices would only retire when they have become burdens to the court itself, or when they recognize themselves that their faculties have become impaired, I would grieve sincerely when they passed away, and you would not feel like such a hypocrite as you do when you are going through the formality of sending telegrams of condolence and giving out interviews for propriety’s sake.
    William Howard Taft (1857–1930)