Utility of The Ottawa Rules
The rules have been found to have a very low rate of false negatives. Evidence in systematic reviews supports the Ottawa ankle rules as an accurate instrument for excluding fractures of the ankle and mid-foot. The instrument has a sensitivity of almost 100% and a modest specificity, and its use should reduce the number of unnecessary radiographs by 30–40%.
Among the studies in the original review their research reported that the test was 100% sensitive and reduced the number of ankle X-rays by about 35%. A second trial with a larger number of patients confirmed these findings. Subsequently, a multi-centre study was done that explored the feasibility of implementing the rules on a wider scale. Unfortunately, teaching the rules to patients does not appear to help reduce presentation to hospital.
Read more about this topic: Ottawa Ankle Rules
Famous quotes containing the words utility and/or rules:
“Moral sensibilities are nowadays at such cross-purposes that to one man a morality is proved by its utility, while to another its utility refutes it.”
—Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900)
“For rhetoric, he could not ope
His mouth, but out there flew a trope;
And when he happen’d to break off
I’ th’ middle of his speech, or cough,
H’ had hard words ready to show why,
And tell what rules he did it by;”
—Samuel Butler (1612–1680)