Description
Oryzomys nelsoni was a large and long-tailed Oryzomys; its tail was longer than that of any other western Mexican Oryzomys. The upperparts were ochraceous to buff, most richly so on the rump, and paler further to the front and low on the flanks. On the head and the back, blackish hairs somewhat darkened the overall color. The underparts were white, with lead-colored underfur that was visible in some places. The ears were covered on both sides with scanty grayish hairs. The large hindfeet were sparsely covered with pale hairs. The tail was largely dark, but the underside of the basal one third to one half was light yellow.
Oryzomys nelsoni was distinctive in its large skull with broad, well-developed incisors and a strong front part (rostrum) that is strongly curved downwards. In O. albiventer, the rostrum and incisors were not as massive, but the molars are larger. The interparietal bone, part of the roof of the braincase, was broad and the incisive foramina, which perforated the palate between the incisors and the molars, were relatively short.
Total length in the four known specimens is 282 to 344 mm (11.1 to 13.5 in), averaging 322 mm (12.7 in); head and body length is 122 to 153 mm (4.8 to 6.0 in), averaging 140.5 mm (5.53 in); tail length is 160 to 191 mm (6.3 to 7.5 in), averaging 181.5 mm (7.15 in); and hindfoot length is 35 to 39 mm (1.4 to 1.5 in), averaging 37.3 mm (1.47 in).
Read more about this topic: Oryzomys Nelsoni
Famous quotes containing the word description:
“A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.”
—John Locke (1632–1704)
“Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.”
—Paul Tillich (1886–1965)
“God damnit, why must all those journalists be such sticklers for detail? Why, they’d hold you to an accurate description of the first time you ever made love, expecting you to remember the color of the room and the shape of the windows.”
—Lyndon Baines Johnson (1908–1973)