Orlando Class Cruiser - Building Programme

Building Programme

On 2 December 1884, the Secretary to the Admiralty stated, "The present Board have been gradually developing, and, as I would venture to say, in an effective manner, our resources for the protection of commerce. The late Board of Admiralty laid down an admirable type for the purpose in the Leander class. We have followed in their footsteps by producing the Mersey type, and we now propose to go a step further in the same direction, by laying down vessels of the Mersey class, but protected by a belt in lieu of an armoured deck. The belt will, I think, be approved by my hon. Friend who sits behind me (Sir Edward J. Reed)." These belted cruisers were the Orlando class.

The following table gives the build details and purchase cost of the members of the Orlando class. Standard British practice at that time was for these costs to exclude armament and stores. In the table:

  • Machinery meant "propelling machinery".
  • Hull included "hydraulic machinery, gun mountings, etc."
Ship Builder Maker
of
Engines
Date of Cost
Laid Down Launch Completion ( BNA 1895) ( BNA 1903)
Hull Machinery Total
Orlando Palmers, Jarrow Palmers 23 Apr 1885 3 Aug 1886 June 1888 £206,647 £60,165 £266,812 £303,065
Aurora Pembroke Dockyard J&G Thompson 1 Feb 1886 28 Oct 1887 July 1889 £220,550 £64,000 £284,550 £326,110
Australia Fairfield Shipbuilding and Engineering Company, Govan C & W Earle 21 Apr 1885 25 Nov 1886 October 1888 £195,390 £63,000 £258,390 £299,027
Galatea Napier, Glasgow Napier 21 Apr 1885 10 Mar 1887 March 1889 £195,390 £63,000 £258,390 £291,803
Immortalite Chatham Dockyard C & W Earle 18 Jan 1886 7 Jul 1887 July 1889 £221,500 £57,000 £278,500 £332,359
Narcissus C & W Earle, Hull C & W Earle 27 Apr 1885 15 Dec 1886 July 1889 £195,890 £61,500 £257,390 £300,149
Undaunted Palmers, Jarrow Palmers 23 Apr 1885 25 Nov 1886 July 1889 £195,890 £60,165 £256,055 £300,863

Read more about this topic:  Orlando Class Cruiser

Famous quotes containing the words building and/or programme:

    The artist must be an egotist because, like the spider, he draws all his building material from his own breast. But just the same the artist alone among men knows what true humility means. His reach forever exceeds his grasp. He can never be satisfied with his work. He knows when he has done well, but he knows he has never attained his dream. He knows he never can.
    Rheta Childe Dorr (1866–1948)

    The idealist’s programme of political or economic reform may be impracticable, absurd, demonstrably ridiculous; but it can never be successfully opposed merely by pointing out that this is the case. A negative opposition cannot be wholly effectual: there must be a competing idealism; something must be offered that is not only less objectionable but more desirable.
    Charles Horton Cooley (1864–1929)