Ore's Theorem - Proof

Proof

Suppose it were possible to construct a graph that fulfils condition (*) which is not Hamiltonian. According to this supposition, let G be a graph on n ≥ 3 vertices that satisfies property (*), is not Hamiltonian, and has the maximum possible number of edges among all n-vertex non-Hamiltonian graphs that satisfy property (*). Because the number of edges was chosen to be maximal, G must contain a Hamiltonian path v1v2...vn, for otherwise it would be possible to add edges to G without breaching property (*). Since G is not Hamiltonian, v1 cannot be adjacent to vn, for otherwise v1v2...vn would be a Hamiltonian cycle. By property (*), deg v1 + deg vnn, and the pigeon hole principle implies that for some i in the range 2 ≤ in − 1, vi is adjacent to v1 and vi − 1 is adjacent to vn. But the cycle v1v2...vi − 1vnvn − 1...vi is then a Hamilton cycle. This contradiction yields the result.

Read more about this topic:  Ore's Theorem

Famous quotes containing the word proof:

    Right and proof are two crutches for everything bent and crooked that limps along.
    Franz Grillparzer (1791–1872)

    The moment a man begins to talk about technique that’s proof that he is fresh out of ideas.
    Raymond Chandler (1888–1959)

    A short letter to a distant friend is, in my opinion, an insult like that of a slight bow or cursory salutation—a proof of unwillingness to do much, even where there is a necessity of doing something.
    Samuel Johnson (1709–1784)