Proof
Suppose it were possible to construct a graph that fulfils condition (*) which is not Hamiltonian. According to this supposition, let G be a graph on n ≥ 3 vertices that satisfies property (*), is not Hamiltonian, and has the maximum possible number of edges among all n-vertex non-Hamiltonian graphs that satisfy property (*). Because the number of edges was chosen to be maximal, G must contain a Hamiltonian path v1v2...vn, for otherwise it would be possible to add edges to G without breaching property (*). Since G is not Hamiltonian, v1 cannot be adjacent to vn, for otherwise v1v2...vn would be a Hamiltonian cycle. By property (*), deg v1 + deg vn ≥ n, and the pigeon hole principle implies that for some i in the range 2 ≤ i ≤ n − 1, vi is adjacent to v1 and vi − 1 is adjacent to vn. But the cycle v1v2...vi − 1vnvn − 1...vi is then a Hamilton cycle. This contradiction yields the result.
Read more about this topic: Ore's Theorem
Famous quotes containing the word proof:
“The chief contribution of Protestantism to human thought is its massive proof that God is a bore.”
—H.L. (Henry Lewis)
“If any doubt has arisen as to me, my country [Virginia] will have my political creed in the form of a Declaration &c. which I was lately directed to draw. This will give decisive proof that my own sentiment concurred with the vote they instructed us to give.”
—Thomas Jefferson (17431826)
“Right and proof are two crutches for everything bent and crooked that limps along.”
—Franz Grillparzer (17911872)