**Finite Difference Models**

The equations used to model the option are often expressed as partial differential equations (see for example Black–Scholes equation). Once expressed in this form, a finite difference model can be derived, and the valuation obtained. A number of implementations of finite difference methods exist for option valuation, including: explicit finite difference, implicit finite difference and the Crank-Nicholson method. A trinomial tree option pricing model can be shown to be a simplified application of the explicit finite difference method. Although the finite difference approach is mathematically sophisticated, it is particularly useful where changes are assumed over time in model inputs – for example dividend yield, risk free rate, or volatility, or some combination of these – that are not tractable in closed form.

Read more about this topic: Option (finance), Model Implementation

### Famous quotes containing the words models, finite and/or difference:

“French rhetorical *models* are too narrow for the English tradition. Most pernicious of French imports is the notion that there is no person behind a text. Is there anything more affected, aggressive, and relentlessly concrete than a Parisan intellectual behind his/her turgid text? The Parisian is a provincial when he pretends to speak for the universe.”

—Camille Paglia (b. 1947)

“For it is only the *finite* that has wrought and suffered; the infinite lies stretched in smiling repose.”

—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

“I never see any *difference* in boys. I only know two sorts of boys. Mealy boys and beef-faced boys.”

—Charles Dickens (1812–1870)