Worked Example
The following is an example of calculating number needed to harm.
In a cohort study, individuals with exposure to a risk factor (Exposure +) are followed for a certain number of years to see if they develop a certain disease or outcome (Disease +). A control group of individuals who are not exposed to the risk factor (Exposure −) are also followed . "Follow up time" is the number of individuals in each group multiplied by the number of years that each individual is followed:
| Disease + | Total subjects followed | Years followed^ | Follow-up time | Incidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure + | 6054 | 86318 | 13.56^ | 1,170,074 | 0.0703 |
| Exposure − | 32 | 516 | 21.84^ | 11,270 | 0.0620 |
^ "Years followed" is a weighted average of the length of time the patients were followed.
The incidence with exposure is:
The incidence without exposure:
To determine the relative risk, divide the incidence with exposure by the incidence without exposure:
- relative risk
To determine attributable risk subtract incidence without exposure from incidence with exposure:
- 0.0703 − 0.0620 = 0.0083 = 0.83% = attributable risk
The number needed to harm is the inverse of the attributable risk, or:
- = Number needed to harm
This means that if 120 individuals are exposed to the risk factor, 1 will develop the disease that would not have otherwise.
Note that these calculations can be affected enormously by roundoff error. (If no roundoff is used in the intermediate calculations above, the final figure for the NNH is 123.)
Read more about this topic: Number Needed To Harm
Famous quotes containing the word worked:
“The difference between a moral man and a man of honor is that the latter regrets a discreditable act, even when it has worked and he has not been caught.”
—H.L. (Henry Lewis)
“The two most far-reaching critical theories at the beginning of the latest phase of industrial society were those of Marx and Freud. Marx showed the moving powers and the conflicts in the social-historical process. Freud aimed at the critical uncovering of the inner conflicts. Both worked for the liberation of man, even though Marx’s concept was more comprehensive and less time-bound than Freud’s.”
—Erich Fromm (1900–1980)