Proof
The following proof is due to Nagata and is taken from Mumford's red book. A proof in the geometric flavor is also given in the page 127 of the red book and this mathoverflow thread.
The ring A in the lede is generated as k-algebra by elements, say, such that are algebraically independent over k and the rest are algebraic over . We shall induct on m. If, then the assertion is trivial. Assume now . It is enough to show that there is a subring S of A that is generated by elements and is such that A is finite over S, for, by inductive hypothesis, we can find algebraically independent elements of S such that S is finite over . Since, there is a nonzero polynomial f in m variables over k such that
- .
Given an integer r which is determined later, set
Then the preceding reads:
- .
Now, the highest term in of looks
Thus, if r is larger than any exponent appearing in f, then the highest term of in also has the form as above. In other words, is integral over . Since are also integral over that ring, A is integral over S. It follows A is finite over S.
Read more about this topic: Noether Normalization Lemma
Famous quotes containing the word proof:
“Sculpture and painting are very justly called liberal arts; a lively and strong imagination, together with a just observation, being absolutely necessary to excel in either; which, in my opinion, is by no means the case of music, though called a liberal art, and now in Italy placed even above the other two—a proof of the decline of that country.”
—Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4th Earl Chesterfield (1694–1773)
“a meek humble Man of modest sense,
Who preaching peace does practice continence;
Whose pious life’s a proof he does believe,
Mysterious truths, which no Man can conceive.”
—John Wilmot, 2d Earl Of Rochester (1647–1680)
“The proof of a poet is that his country absorbs him as affectionately as he has absorbed it.”
—Walt Whitman (1819–1892)