Limits of Nets
If (xα) is a net from a directed set A into X, and if Y is a subset of X, then we say that (xα) is eventually in Y (or residually in Y) if there exists an α in A so that for every β in A with β ≥ α, the point xβ lies in Y.
If (xα) is a net in the topological space X, and x is an element of X, we say that the net converges towards x or has limit x and write
- lim xα = x
if and only if
- for every neighborhood U of x, (xα) is eventually in U.
Intuitively, this means that the values xα come and stay as close as we want to x for large enough α.
Note that the example net given above on the neighborhood system of a point x does indeed converge to x according to this definition.
Given a base for the topology, in order to prove convergence of a net it is necessary and sufficient to prove that there exists some point x, such that (xα) is eventually in all members of the base containing this putative limit.
Read more about this topic: Net (mathematics)
Famous quotes containing the words limits of, limits and/or nets:
“An art whose limits depend on a moving image, mass audience, and industrial production is bound to differ from an art whose limits depend on language, a limited audience, and individual creation. In short, the filmed novel, in spite of certain resemblances, will inevitably become a different artistic entity from the novel on which it is based.”
—George Bluestone, U.S. educator, critic. The Limits of the Novel and the Limits of the Film, Novels Into Film, Johns Hopkins Press (1957)
“Whatever appeals to the imagination, by transcending the ordinary limits of human ability, wonderfully encourages and liberates us.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (18031882)
“And Jesus said to them, Follow me and I will make you fish for people. And immediately they left their nets and followed him.”
—Bible: New Testament, Mark 1:17,18.