Underlying Principles of Needs Analysis
The following list gives the principles of needs analysis as originally defined.
- User’s need based requirements are complex and can conflict
- User’s need based requirements build a bridge from the business case to the design
- User’s need based requirements help to identify trade-offs that need to happen in the design process (i.e. where a design cannot resolve the user’s need based requirement conflicts)
- User’s need based requirements are there to unify the multi-disciplinary design team; enabling them to meet their business case.
- Formulate and ask questions to do with the business plan that provide an indication of the human aspects of the system, including the relative merit of functionality.
- Always express these findings from the user’s perspective.
- Cross-relate these requirements to each other and to the impactors on the activity.
- Allocate sufficient time during the development process to check and validate your user’s need based requirements.
- Ensure that all user’s need based requirements are derived as low level user requirements before being transposed into system requirements.
- Word your requirements precisely and ensure that you cover all categories of human-related requirements.
- Create test statements to validate the user’s need based requirements, the concept and the implementation
- Prior to freezing your design, validate your user’s need based requirements with users
- Accept that there still may be contradictory requirements
- Understand the nuances of the requirements and ensure that these are reflected in the precise wording of the requirements
- Keep asking your users until you have a true understanding of their requirements
- Elegant design can only be created from understanding the nuances of the requirements
Read more about this topic: Needs Analysis
Famous quotes containing the words underlying, principles and/or analysis:
“The dominant metaphor of conceptual relativism, that of differing points of view, seems to betray an underlying paradox. Different points of view make sense, but only if there is a common co-ordinate system on which to plot them; yet the existence of a common system belies the claim of dramatic incomparability.”
—Donald Davidson (b. 1917)
“It must appear impossible, that theism could, from reasoning, have been the primary religion of human race, and have afterwards, by its corruption, given birth to polytheism and to all the various superstitions of the heathen world. Reason, when obvious, prevents these corruptions: When abstruse, it keeps the principles entirely from the knowledge of the vulgar, who are alone liable to corrupt any principle or opinion.
”
—David Hume (1711–1776)
“A commodity appears at first sight an extremely obvious, trivial thing. But its analysis brings out that it is a very strange thing, abounding in metaphysical subtleties and theological niceties.”
—Karl Marx (1818–1883)