Napkin Ring Problem - Proof

Proof

Suppose the radius of the sphere is and the length of the cylinder (or the tunnel) is .

By the Pythagorean theorem, the radius of the cylinder is

and the radius of the horizontal cross-section of the sphere at height y above the "equator" is

The cross-section of the band with the plane at height y is the region inside the larger circle of radius given by (2) and outside the smaller circle of radius given by (1). The cross-section's area is therefore the area of the larger circle minus the area of the smaller circle:

\begin{align} & {}\quad \pi(\text{larger radius})^2 - \pi(\text{smaller radius})^2 \\ & = \pi\left(\sqrt{R^2 - y^2}\right)^2 - \pi\left(\sqrt{R^2 - \left(\frac{h}{2}\right)^2\,{}}\,\right)^2 = \pi\left(\left(\frac{h}{2}\right)^2 - y^2\right). \end{align}

The radius R does not appear in the last quantity. Therefore the area of the horizontal cross-section at height y does not depend on R. The volume of the band is

and that does not depend on R.

This is an application of Cavalieri's principle: volumes with equal-sized corresponding cross-sections are equal. Indeed, the area of the cross-section is the same as that of the corresponding cross-section of a sphere of radius h/2, which has volume

Read more about this topic:  Napkin Ring Problem

Famous quotes containing the word proof:

    “War is a beastly business, it is true, but one proof we are human is our ability to learn, even from it, how better to exist.”
    —M.F.K. Fisher (1908–1992)

    “The moment a man begins to talk about technique that’s proof that he is fresh out of ideas.”
    —Raymond Chandler (1888–1959)

    “The thing with Catholicism, the same as all religions, is that it teaches what should be, which seems rather incorrect. This is “what should be.” Now, if you’re taught to live up to a “what should be” that never existed—only an occult superstition, no proof of this “should be”Mthen you can sit on a jury and indict easily, you can cast the first stone, you can burn Adolf Eichmann, like that!”
    —Lenny Bruce (1925–1966)