Proof
A standard proof of the Nakayama lemma uses the following technique due to Atiyah & Macdonald (1969).
- Let M be an R-module generated by n elements, and φ : M → M an R-linear map. If there is an ideal I of R such that φ(M) ⊂ IM, then there is a monic polynomial
-
- with pk ∈ Ik, such that
- as an endomorphism of M.
This assertion is precisely a generalized version of the Cayley–Hamilton theorem, and the proof proceeds along the same lines. On the generators xi of M, one has a relation of the form
where aij ∈ I. Thus
The required result follows by multiplying by the adjugate of the matrix (φδij − aij) and invoking Cramer's rule. One finds then det(φδij − aij) = 0, so the required polynomial is
To prove Nakayama's lemma from the Cayley–Hamilton theorem, assume that IM = M and take φ to be the identity on M. Then define a polynomial p(x) as above. Then
has the required property.
Read more about this topic: Nakayama Lemma
Famous quotes containing the word proof:
“The moment a man begins to talk about technique thats proof that he is fresh out of ideas.”
—Raymond Chandler (18881959)
“The fact that several men were able to become infatuated with that latrine is truly the proof of the decline of the men of this century.”
—Charles Baudelaire (18211867)
“The chief contribution of Protestantism to human thought is its massive proof that God is a bore.”
—H.L. (Henry Lewis)