Multi 2 Diamonds - Description

Description

An opening bid of 2 classically shows one of four types :

  1. Weak two in a major suit (6-11 HCP)
  2. A strong balanced hand of a defined range
  3. Strong three-suited hand
  4. An ACOL 2 type ; typically in a minor

Often the convention is played with only one of the strong options being present, i.e. a three-way bid. As long as at least one strong option is present, the multi 2 opening is a forcing bid. More recently a trend has been seen to play a "hearts only multi" in which the weak 2 option is always hearts. "Spades only multi" also presumably exists. The first response assumes that opener has a weak two in a major.

Another popular innovation is the 'mini multi', which contains no strong option. This variant is actually less legal (i.e. legal in fewer tournaments) than the traditional multi. This may seem odd, but there is a logical explanation. The reason is that the ambiguity inherent in a multi opening is a double edged sword - it can cause more problems for the pair using it than for their opponents (typically when the multi opener has a strong hand and his partner has support for both majors). This risk is no longer present when using the mini multi.

Responding to the multi:

Assuming his left hand opponent passes, the partner of the multi opener is forced to bid. He has several options available:

  • 2♥: this is a Pass or correct bid typically showing a hand with no support (two or fewer cards) for hearts and no interest in game.
  • 2♠: this is also a Pass or correct bid, which shows no support for spades but guarantees at least three card support for hearts.
  • 3/4 ♥/♠: these bids extend the principle of the previous two, showing progressively greater levels of support for the majors. For example, 3♠ would show three card support for spades and four card (or longer) support for hearts. Not all pairs allow these higher-level responses to the multi because they can cause problems if opener has one of the strong hand variants.
  • 2NT: Forcing, asking opener to clarify his hand. This bid will be used with stronger hands than those above, where opener is interested in bidding game on the basis of High card point strength rather than having a good fit.

Opener's rebids:

  • With type (1):
    • Over 2/3/4♥: pass or bid ♠at the appropriate level;
    • Over 2/3♠: pass or bid ♥at the appropriate level;
    • Over 2NT several schemes exist for answering:
      • Scheme 1:
        • bid 3♣ to show hearts, upper range or type 4 with clubs;
        • 3 to show spades, upper range or type 4 with diamonds;
        • 3♥ or 3♠ with lower range.
      • Scheme 2, first variant (not playable if type 4 hands are possible):
        • bid 3♣ to show hearts, lower range;
        • bid 3 to show spades, lower range;
        • bid 3♥ or 3♠ with upper range.
      • Scheme 3, second variant:
        • bid 3♣ or 3 as in first variant;
        • bid 3♥ to show spades, upper range;
        • bid 3♠ to show hearts, upper range.
      • Scheme 4 (PLauken), second variant:
        • bid 3♣ to show upper range, unknown suit;
        • bid 3 to show hearts, lower range;
        • bid 3♥ to show spades, lower range.
  • With type (2):
    • rebid in notrumps at minimum level
  • Other rebids show type (3) and should be specified on the Convention card.

Read more about this topic:  Multi 2 Diamonds

Famous quotes containing the word description:

    God damnit, why must all those journalists be such sticklers for detail? Why, they’d hold you to an accurate description of the first time you ever made love, expecting you to remember the color of the room and the shape of the windows.
    Lyndon Baines Johnson (1908–1973)

    Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.
    Paul Tillich (1886–1965)

    The Sage of Toronto ... spent several decades marveling at the numerous freedoms created by a “global village” instantly and effortlessly accessible to all. Villages, unlike towns, have always been ruled by conformism, isolation, petty surveillance, boredom and repetitive malicious gossip about the same families. Which is a precise enough description of the global spectacle’s present vulgarity.
    Guy Debord (b. 1931)