List of Mozart's Symphonies of Spurious or Doubtful Authenticity
No. | K1 number |
K6 number |
Year (if known) | Title | Movements | Comments | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | K. 15a–ss | K. 15a–ss | 1764 | Keyboard sketches in E Flat major ("Symphony No. 0") | 4 | Mozart's London notebook contains 43 music sketches, catalogued K. 15a to K. 15ss. From four of these, Mozart scholar Neal Zaslaw has hypothesized a possible lost "London" symphony in four movements. The chief basis for this conjecture is his interpretation of remarks by Nannerl Mozart, quoted in Zaslaw, p. 17, but there is no independent evidence of the work's existence. | |
2 | K. 16b | Anh. C11.01 | 1765 | Symphony in C major | – | This work from the London period exists only in sketch form, and is generally thought to be by Leopold Mozart. | |
3 | K. 17 | Anh. C11.02 | 1765? | Symphony in B flat major "No. 2" | 4 | Attributed to Mozart in K1 on the basis of a 19th century copy, and labelled his second symphony, the provenance of this work has since been questioned, chiefly on the grounds of low quality (Dearling calls it "rustic and rather awkward.") Current assumption is that it is not Wolfgang's, but could be a Leopold Mozart symphony. | |
4 | K. 18 | Anh. A51 | 1764? | Symphony in E flat major "No. 3" | 3 | Included in K1 as Mozart's third symphony, this has been identified as Symphony No. 6 by Carl Friedrich Abel, copied and possibly re-orchestrated by Mozart in London, as an exercise. | |
5 | Anh. 220 | K. 16a | Unknown | Symphony in A minor ("Odense") | 3 | The orchestral parts for this work were found in Odense, Denmark, in 1983 and were hailed as the discovery of a lost A minor symphony. The first performance took place on 9 December 1984. Since then, examination of the manuscript and analysis of the lost work's history have led to the conclusion that the work is probably one of a number of spurious symphonies handled by Hamburg music dealer J.C. Westphal. (d. 1797) | |
6 | Anh. 222 | K. 19b | 1765? | Symphony in C major | – | A three-bar Allegro opening, all that exists of this work, was identified by musicologist Alfred Einstein as part of a lost C major symphony from Mozart's London period. Doubts have subsequently been cast on its origins, and its attribution is now uncertain. | |
7 | K. 76 | K. 42a | 1767? | Symphony in F major "No. 43" (In NMA, Section 46) |
4 | Until recently its attribution to Mozart was accepted, but is now uncertain. Possibly by Leopold Mozart (Zaslaw), but this is disputed by Leopold expert Cliff Eisen, who thinks it the work of neither Leopold nor Wolfgang. | |
8 | Anh. 214 | K. 45b | 1767? | Symphony in B flat major "No. 55" |
4 | Symphony was lost until a copy was found in Berlin, 1943. The origins of the symphony are disputed (1767, Salzburg per Zaslaw, 1768, Vienna per NMA). Attribution to Mozart cannot be confirmed, but it is frequently treated as genuine. | |
9 | Anh. 215 | K. 66c | 1768? | Symphony in D major | – | One of a group of three lost symphonies (see 66d and 66e) known only by incipits in the Breitkopf & Härtel catalogue. Dearling speculates they may have been written later, in preparation for the family's 1769 Italian trip, but there is no direct evidence that they are Mozart's work. | |
10 | Anh. 217 | K. 66d | 1768? | Symphony in B flat major | – | See note on K. 66c | |
11 | Anh. 218 | K. 66e | Unknown | Symphony in B flat major | – | See note on K. 66c | |
12 | Anh. 216 | Anh. C11.03 (K3: 74g) | 1770? | Symphony in B flat major "No. 54" | 4 | Until 1910 this was known only by an incipit. A copy, since lost, was then discovered in the Berlin library, and the work was assumed to be authentic, on the basis of "style" rather than substantiation. Modern opinion, in the absence of direct evidence, is that its authorship remains uncertain. | |
13 | K. 98 | Anh. C11.04 | 1770? | Symphony in F major "No. 56" | 4 | Originally taken as authentic Mozart by, among others, Köchel, the symphony has since come to be regarded as the work of an unidentified composer with no connection to the Mozart circle. However, there are two copies both attributed to Mozart. | |
14 | – | Anh. C11.05 | Unknown | Symphony in B flat major | 2 | Published in Paris around 1806, lost and rediscovered in 1937, this was then thought to be a second "Paris symphony". However, its low quality ("a third rate imitation of a French operetta overture" – Zaslaw) indicated that it was more likely a forgery by an unknown hand. | |
15 | Anh. 219 | Anh. C11.06 | Unknown | Symphony in D major | – | Listed in the Brietkopf & Härtel catalogue as a Mozart work obtained from Hamburg music dealer Johann Christoph Westphal, this is a symphony by Leopold Mozart. | |
16 | – | Anh. C11.07 | Unknown | Symphony in D major | – | Known only by 2-bar incipit in the Breitkopf & Härtel Manuscript Catalogue. Attribution to Mozart uncertain. | |
17 | – | Anh. C11.08 | Unknown | Symphony in F major | – | Known only by 4-bar incipit in the Breitkopf & Härtel Manuscript Catalogue. Attribution to Mozart uncertain. | |
18 | K. 81 | K. 73l | 1770 | Symphony in D major "No. 44" |
3 | Opinion is divided on the authorship, between Leopold and Wolfgang Mozart. Originally listed in the Breitkopf catalogue as Leopold's, later conjecture has proposed the work as Wolfgang's, but there is no certainty either way. | |
19 | K. 97 | K. 73m | 1770 | Symphony in D major "No. 47" |
4 | Only the lack of an autograph score has created uncertainty in this symphony's attribution. It is frequently accepted as authentic Mozart. Dearling expresses no doubt as to its authenticity. | |
20 | K. 95 | K. 73n | 1770? | Symphony in D major "No. 45" |
4 | Zaslaw describes this as a symphony whose authenticity has "never been seriously enough questioned". Apart from the lack of an autograph score, the grounds for its assignment to 1770 and Rome in K1 and K6 are unstated. The work has Mozartian characteristics, and may be genuine but from an earlier period, but this cannot be verified. | |
21 | K. 84 | K. 73q | 1770 | Symphony in D major "No. 11" |
3 | Copies of the score from Vienna, Berlin, and Prague attribute the work respectively to Wolfgang, Leopold, and Carl Dittersdorf. Stylistic analysis indicates that, of the three, Wolfgang is the most likely composer, and Dittersdorf the least. | |
22 | K. 75 | K. 75 | 1771 | Symphony in F major "No. 42" |
4 | Although its authenticity is uncertain, its attribution to Mozart has not been generally questioned, despite what Zaslaw calls a "mysterious provenance". Also, the Minuet and Trio is atypically the second rather than the third movement. | |
23 | K. 96 | K. 111b | 1771? | Symphony in C major "No. 46" |
4 | Certain stylistic features challenge the work's assumed dating; the work may be of later provenance. In the absence of an autograph score or other direct evidence it cannot be attributed to Mozart with certainty. However, it is usually treated as authentic. | |
24 | Anh. 293 | Anh. C11.09 | 1775 | Symphony in G major | 4 | Widely accepted as a symphony by Leopold Mozart, it has in the past been attributed to Wolfgang. | |
25 | K. 291 | Anh. A52 | 1781? | Symphony in D major | 3 | This symphony, Perger No. 43 by Michael Haydn, was wrongly attributed to Mozart on the basis of a fragment of manuscript which Mozart copied, apparently to help him study the fugue form of the final movement. | |
26 | – | Anh. A59 | 1783? | Four incipits in D, G, and D and C major | – | Three of these incipits have been identified with symphonies by Joseph Haydn: Nos 47, 62 and 75. The fourth is unidentified, and is possibly a fragment of a lost Mozart symphony. | |
27 | – | Anh. C11.10 | Unknown | Symphony in F major | ? | A symphony, wrongly attributed to Mozart, by Ignace Pleyel (1757–1831), an Austrian composer and Kapellmeister at Strasbourg in 1789. He wrote many symphonies and other orchestral pieces, but his greatest fame was as a piano manufacturer. | |
28 | – | Anh. C11.11 | 1783 | Symphony in C major | ? | A symphony by the Bohemian composer Adelbert Gyrowetz (1763–1850). This was performed in 1785 at a concert given by Mozart in Vienna, and assumed to be Mozart's own work. | |
29 | K. 444 | Anh. A53 | 1784? | Symphony in G major "No. 37" | 3 | A symphony by Michael Haydn, Perger No. 16, for which Mozart wrote a 20-bar slow introduction. It was premiered in Linz at the same concert as Mozart's 36th ("Linz") symphony. Until 1907 the entire work was thought to be Mozart's, and it was frequently performed as his 37th. | |
30 | – | Anh. C11.12 | Unknown | Symphony in F major | – | Zaslaw identifies this work, from the K.6 Anhang as a symphony of Carl Dittersdorf, mistakenly attributed to Mozart. | |
31 | Anh. 294 | Anh. C11.13 | Unknown | Symphony in G major | – | Zaslaw identifies this work, from the K.6 Anhang as a symphony by Leopold Mozart. | |
32 | – | Anh. C11.14 | Unknown | Symphony in C major | ? | Discovered in Milan in 1944, and announced as a lost Mozart symphony, this was found to be the work of Anton (also known as Franz Josef) Eberl (1765–1807), a near-contemporary of Mozart's, whose compositions sometimes appeared under Mozart's name. | |
33 | – | Anh. C11.15 | Unknown | Symphony in C major | 4 | Symphony by an unknown composer, manuscript held by the Národní Muzeum, Prague. The name "Mozart" appears on the cover, but, according to Zaslaw: "There are no compelling source or musical reasons to suppose that (this) came from the pen of Wolfgang Mozart". | |
34 | – | Anh. C11.16 | Unknown | Symphony in G or C major | – | A symphony by an unknown composer, identified by Zaslaw as at some time attributed to Mozart, but no details of its provenance are given. | |
35 | – | K. deest | 1767 | Symphony in G major ("Neue Lambach") |
4 | Discovered at the Lambach monastery which the Mozart family visited in 1769, this is generally accepted as by Leopold Mozart than Wolfgang. Dearling notes a "remarkable" resemblance to Dittersdorf's Symphony No. 1. | |
36 | – | K. deest | 1760 | "Sinfonia" | 1 | A work by Johann Georg Wassmuth (d. 1766), court composer and Kapellmeister at Würzburg. A manuscript in the Thurn und Taxis library, Regensberg, wrongly attributes it to Mozart. | |
37 | – | K. deest | 1785 | Symphony in C minor | 4 | A symphony by Joseph Martin Kraus (1766–1792), mistakenly categorised by Bibliothèque nationale, Paris 1971, as a work by Mozart, probably based on misreading of the manuscript signature. | |
38 | – | K. deest | 1730 | Symphony in D major | 2 | A work, Artaserse, by Johann Adolph Hasse, mistakenly attributed to Mozart by the later addition of his name on the original manuscript in Thurn und Taxis library, Regensberg. | |
39 | – | K. deest | 1761 | Symphony | ? | A symphony of Joseph Haydn, mentioned by Zaslaw as having a spurious attribution to Mozart, identified only as "Hob. I:6." |
Read more about this topic: Mozart Symphonies Of Spurious Or Doubtful Authenticity
Famous quotes containing the words list of, list, mozart, spurious and/or doubtful:
“Loves boat has been shattered against the life of everyday. You and I are quits, and its useless to draw up a list of mutual hurts, sorrows, and pains.”
—Vladimir Mayakovsky (18931930)
“I am opposed to writing about the private lives of living authors and psychoanalyzing them while they are alive. Criticism is getting all mixed up with a combination of the Junior F.B.I.- men, discards from Freud and Jung and a sort of Columnist peep- hole and missing laundry list school.... Every young English professor sees gold in them dirty sheets now. Imagine what they can do with the soiled sheets of four legal beds by the same writer and you can see why their tongues are slavering.”
—Ernest Hemingway (18991961)
“Mozart has the classic purity of light and the blue ocean; Beethoven the romantic grandeur which belongs to the storms of air and sea, and while the soul of Mozart seems to dwell on the ethereal peaks of Olympus, that of Beethoven climbs shuddering the storm-beaten sides of a Sinai. Blessed be they both! Each represents a moment of the ideal life, each does us good. Our love is due to both.”
—Henri-Frédéric Amiel (18211881)
“There are people who indulge themselves in a sort of lying, which they reckon innocent, and which in one sense is so; for it hurts nobody but themselves. This sort of lying is the spurious offspring of vanity, begotten upon folly.”
—Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4th Earl Chesterfield (16941773)
“Has it ever occurred to you that friendship, at best, is a rather doubtful asset? I dont want friends. I shall have worshippers and followers. People who will obey me because they recognize my greatness. Those who are loyal will be rewarded, and the othersdestroyed.”
—Lester Cole (19041985)