The Moral Constitution is a means of understanding the U.S. Constitution which emphasizes a fusion of moral philosophy and constitutional law. The most prominent proponent is Ronald Dworkin, who advances the view in Law's Empire and Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Alternatively, it can be taken to mean a constitution that defines the fundamental political principles and establishes the power and duties of each government, and does so while being consistent with a moral code. The moral code in turn can be in any of the forms that constitutions can be in, such as written, unwritten, codified, uncodified, etc.
It would appear that such a constitution would create a change in the application of law and in particularly Constitutional Law from a rule of law paradigm to a morality-based paradigm, and would require the explanation and descritption of that rule of morality as a principle of operation of the government specified in this constitution as a fundamental component of its structure.
The description of a rule of morality, or moral code can come in two forms. It can be a set of rules, such as the biblical Ten Commandments, and is the form of most legal systems of government today. Alternatively, it can be a set of principles, or a moral code. The latter form does not seem to have any presently working exemplars in any known government and is little commented upon.
Indeed, this alternative definition of a concept of a Moral Constitution seems to exist in any form at all only in the Bill of Morals efforts of the present government of South Africa.
Famous quotes containing the words moral and/or constitution:
“No one can be perfectly free till all are free; no one can be perfectly moral till all are moral; no one can be perfectly happy till all are happy.”
—Herbert Spencer (18201903)
“Can you conceive what it is to native-born American women citizens, accustomed to the advantages of our schools, our churches and the mingling of our social life, to ask over and over again for so simple a thing as that we, the people, should mean women as well as men; that our Constitution should mean exactly what it says?”
—Mary F. Eastman, U.S. suffragist. As quoted in History of Woman Suffrage, vol. 4 ch. 5, by Susan B. Anthony and Ida Husted Harper (1902)