Problems
The main problem of metric time lies in the units. The International System of Units has only developed prefixes regarding 10 units exponentially in both the multiple and submultiple directions. The first three multiples would be viable for use within a metric time system; they are:
| Multiple | Name of Unit | Seconds | Minutes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | decasecond | 10 | |
| 102 | hectosecond | 100 | 1.666 |
| 103 | kilosecond | 1 000 | 16.666 |
However, the SI Units’ fourth value is:
| Multiple | Name of Unit | Seconds | Minutes | Hours | Days | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 106 | megasecond | 1 000 000 | 16 666.666 | 277.777 | 11.574 | |
| 109 | gigasecond | 1 000 000 000 | 16 666 666.666 | 277 777.777 | 11 574.074 | 31.689 |
This makes for relatively nonviable units with which to measure human time/life.
To make this system of prefixes work for metric time, standard units and prefixes would need to be developed or revived for the 4th and 5th exponents to make metric time viable to human life. Historically, the metric system included a myria- prefix to represent 104, but the SI disposed of it. 105 was represented using various ad hoc solutions; 100 000 meters composed a grade, 100 000 pascals composed a bar, and 100 000 dynes composed a newton. Meteorologists currently use a unit of 100 000 seconds (a quantity on the order of a day) to quantify atmospheric vorticity at the synoptic scale; the unit, however, does not have a name.
| Multiple | Name of Unit | Seconds | Minutes | Hours | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 104 | myriasecond | 10 000 | 166.6 | 2.777 | |
| 105 | metric day | 100 000 | 1 666.6 | 27.77 | 1.157 |
Read more about this topic: Metric Time
Famous quotes containing the word problems:
“If family communication is good, parents can pick up the signs of stress in children and talk about it before it results in some crisis. If family communication is bad, not only will parents be insensitive to potential crises, but the poor communication will contribute to problems in the family.”
—Donald C. Medeiros (20th century)
“I rarely speak about God. To God, yes. I protest against Him. I shout at Him. But to open a discourse about the qualities of God, about the problems that God imposes, theodicy, no. And yet He is there, in silence, in filigree.”
—Elie Wiesel (b. 1928)
““What we know, is a point to what we do not know.” Open any recent journal of science, and weigh the problems suggested concerning Light, Heat, Electricity, Magnetism, Physiology, Geology, and judge whether the interest of natural science is likely to be soon exhausted.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)