McCarthy 91 Function - Proof

Proof

Here is a proof that the function behaves as expected.

For 90 ≤ n < 101,

M(n) = M(M(n + 11)) = M(n + 11 - 10), where n + 11 >= 101 since n >= 90 = M(n + 1)

So M(n) = 91 for 90 ≤ n < 101.

We can use this as a base case for induction on blocks of 11 numbers, like so:

Assume that M(n) = 91 for a ≤ n < a + 11.

Then, for any n such that a - 11 ≤ n < a,

M(n) = M(M(n + 11)) = M(91), by hypothesis, since a ≤ n + 11 < a + 11 = 91, by the base case.

Now by induction M(n) = 91 for any n in such a block. There are no holes between the blocks, so M(n) = 91 for n < 101. We can also add n = 101 as a special case.

Read more about this topic:  McCarthy 91 Function

Famous quotes containing the word proof:

    “If we view our children as stupid, naughty, disturbed, or guilty of their misdeeds, they will learn to behold themselves as foolish, faulty, or shameful specimens of humanity. They will regard us as judges from whom they wish to hide, and they will interpret everything we say as further proof of their unworthiness. If we view them as innocent, or at least merely ignorant, they will gain understanding from their experiences, and they will continue to regard us as wise partners.”
    —Polly Berrien Berends (20th century)

    “Right and proof are two crutches for everything bent and crooked that limps along.”
    —Franz Grillparzer (1791–1872)

    “The thing with Catholicism, the same as all religions, is that it teaches what should be, which seems rather incorrect. This is “what should be.” Now, if you’re taught to live up to a “what should be” that never existed—only an occult superstition, no proof of this “should be”Mthen you can sit on a jury and indict easily, you can cast the first stone, you can burn Adolf Eichmann, like that!”
    —Lenny Bruce (1925–1966)