Maximal Elements and The Greatest Element
It looks like should be a greatest element or maximum but in fact it is not necessarily the case: the definition of maximal element is somewhat weaker. Suppose we find with, then, by the definition of greatest element, so that . In other words, a maximum, if it exists, is the (unique) maximal element.
The converse is not true: there can be maximal elements despite there being no maximum. Example 3 is an instance of existence of many maximal elements and no maximum. The reason is, again, that in general is only a partial order on . If is a maximal element and, it remains the possibility that neither nor .
If there are many maximal elements, they are in some contexts called a frontier, as in the Pareto frontier.
Of course, when the restriction of to is a total order, the notions of maximal element and greatest element coincide. Let be a maximal element, for any either or . In the second case the definition of maximal element requires so we conclude that . In other words, is a greatest element.
Finally, let us remark that being totally ordered is sufficient to ensure that a maximal element is a greatest element, but it is not necessary.
Read more about this topic: Maximal Element
Famous quotes containing the words elements, greatest and/or element:
“Let us have a fair field! This is all we ask, and we will be content with nothing less. The finger of evolution, which touches everything, is laid tenderly upon women. They have on their side all the elements of progress, and its spirit stirs within them. They are fighting, not for themselves alone, but for the future of humanity. Let them have a fair field!”
—Tennessee Claflin (1846–1923)
“Printer, philosopher, scientist, author and patriot, impeccable husband and citizen, why isn’t he an archetype? Pioneers, Oh Pioneers! Benjamin was one of the greatest pioneers of the United States. Yet we just can’t do with him. What’s wrong with him then? Or what’s wrong with us?”
—D.H. (David Herbert)
“One can describe a landscape in many different words and sentences, but one would not normally cut up a picture of a landscape and rearrange it in different patterns in order to describe it in different ways. Because a photograph is not composed of discrete units strung out in a linear row of meaningful pieces, we do not understand it by looking at one element after another in a set sequence. The photograph is understood in one act of seeing; it is perceived in a gestalt.”
—Joshua Meyrowitz, U.S. educator, media critic. “The Blurring of Public and Private Behaviors,” No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior, Oxford University Press (1985)