Lucas Island Model
The Lucas Island Model is an economic model formulated by Robert Lucas, Jr. Before Keynes' The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money was written, many economists were active in the research of business cycles. In the early 1930s Friedrich Hayek introduced the idea that business cycles stems from individuals misperceptions about relative prices. This idea was taken up by Lucas almost forty years later.
The hypothesis that aggregate supply depends on relative prices is central to the new classical explanation of business cycles. The purpose of the model is to establish the link between money supply and price and output changes in a simplified economy using Rational expectations. Lucas sought to explain the short term procyclicality of output and inflation (the “Phillips curve”) while maintaining the neutrality of money assumption.
This particular model appeared in a series of papers in the early 1970s. These papers especially those by Lucas (1972), (1973) and (1975) were enormously influential in illustrating (and popularising) the power of Rational Expectations as a modelling technique. These papers show us how to use simple general equilibrium models to arrive at structural models of economic fluctuations.
Read more about Lucas Island Model: Assumptions, The Model, Applications of The Model, Criticism
Famous quotes containing the words lucas, island and/or model:
“I hope you ain’t going to blow up my boat, Mr. Johnson. Like my wife, she’s not much, but she’s all I have.”
—Martin Berkeley. Jack Arnold. Lucas (Nestor Paiva)
“The shifting islands! who would not be willing that his house should be undermined by such a foe! The inhabitant of an island can tell what currents formed the land which he cultivates; and his earth is still being created or destroyed. There before his door, perchance, still empties the stream which brought down the material of his farm ages before, and is still bringing it down or washing it away,—the graceful, gentle robber!”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“She represents the unavowed aspiration of the male human being, his potential infidelity—and infidelity of a very special kind, which would lead him to the opposite of his wife, to the “woman of wax” whom he could model at will, make and unmake in any way he wished, even unto death.”
—Marguerite Duras (b. 1914)