Comparison
At and above a thousand million (≥ 109), the same numerical value has two different names, depending on whether the value is being expressed in the long or short scale. Equivalently, the same name has two different numerical values depending on whether it is being used in the long or short scale.
Each scale has a logical justification to explain the use of each such differing numerical name and value within that scale. The short-scale logic is based on powers of one thousand, whereas the long-scale logic is based on powers of one million. In both scales, the prefix bi- refers to "2" and tri- refers to "3", etc. However only in the long scale do the prefixes beyond one million indicate the actual power or exponent (of 1,000,000). In the short scale, the prefixes refer to one less than the exponent (of 1,000).
The relationship between the numeric values and the corresponding names in the two scales can be described as:
| Value in Scientific notation |
Value in numerals |
Short Scale | Long Scale | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Logic | Name | Logic | ||
| 10 0 | 1 | one | one | ||
| 10 3 | 1,000 | thousand | thousand | ||
| 10 6 | 1,000,000 | million | million | ||
| 10 9 | 1,000,000,000 | billion | 1,000×1,0002 | thousand million or milliard | |
| 1012 | 1,000,000,000,000 | trillion | 1,000×1,0003 | billion | 1,000,0002 |
| 1015 | 1,000,000,000,000,000 | quadrillion | 1,000×1,0004 | thousand billion or billiard | |
| 1018 | 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 | quintillion | 1,000×1,0005 | trillion | 1,000,0003 |
| 1021 | 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 | sextillion | 1,000×1,0006 | thousand trillion or trilliard | |
| 1024 | 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 | septillion | 1,000×1,0007 | quadrillion | 1,000,0004 |
| etc. | etc. | To get from one named order of magnitude to the next: multiply by 1,000 |
To get from one named order of magnitude to the next: multiply by 1,000,000 |
||
The root mil in "million" does not refer to the numeral "one". Rather, it refers to the Latin word for "thousand" (milia).
The relationship between the names and the corresponding numeric values in the two scales can be described as:
| Name | Short Scale | Long Scale | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value in Scientific notation |
Logic | Value in Scientific notation |
Logic | |
| million | 106 | 106 | ||
| billion | 109 | 1,000×1,0002 | 1012 | 1,000,0002 |
| trillion | 1012 | 1,000×1,0003 | 1018 | 1,000,0003 |
| quadrillion | 1015 | 1,000×1,0004 | 1024 | 1,000,0004 |
| etc. | To get from one named order of magnitude to the next: multiply by 1,000 |
To get from one named order of magnitude to the next: multiply by 1,000,000 |
||
The word milliard, or its translation, is found in many European languages and is used in those languages for 109. However, it is unknown in American English, which uses billion, and not used in British English, which preferred to use thousand million before the current usage of billion. The financial term yard, which derives from milliard, is used on financial markets, as it is unambiguous, unlike billion. Likewise, many long scale countries use the word billiard (or similar) for a thousand long scale billions (i.e. 1015), and the word trilliard (or similar) for a thousand long scale trillions (i.e. 1021), etc.
Read more about this topic: Long And Short Scales
Famous quotes containing the word comparison:
“In everyone’s youthful dreams, philosophy is still vaguely but inseparably, and with singular truth, associated with the East, nor do after years discover its local habitation in the Western world. In comparison with the philosophers of the East, we may say that modern Europe has yet given birth to none.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“In comparison to the French Revolution, the American Revolution has come to seem a parochial and rather dull event. This, despite the fact that the American Revolution was successful—realizing the purposes of the revolutionaries and establishing a durable political regime—while the French Revolution was a resounding failure, devouring its own children and leading to an imperial despotism, followed by an eventual restoration of the monarchy.”
—Irving Kristol (b. 1920)
“The difference between human vision and the image perceived by the faceted eye of an insect may be compared with the difference between a half-tone block made with the very finest screen and the corresponding picture as represented by the very coarse screening used in common newspaper pictorial reproduction. The same comparison holds good between the way Gogol saw things and the way average readers and average writers see things.”
—Vladimir Nabokov (1899–1977)