Lock (computer Science) - Language Support

Language Support

See also: Barrier (computer science)

Language support for locking depends on the language used:

  • There is no API to handle mutexes in the ISO/IEC standard for C. The current ISO C++ standard, C++11, supports threading facilities. The OpenMP standard is supported by some compilers, and this provides critical sections to be specified using pragmas. The POSIX pthread API provides lock support. Visual C++ allows adding the synchronize attribute in the code to mark methods that must be synchronized, but this is specific to "COM objects" in the Windows architecture and Visual C++ compiler. C and C++ can easily access any native operating system locking features.
  • Java provides the keyword synchronized to put locks on blocks of code, methods or objects and libraries featuring concurrency-safe data structures.
  • In the C# programming language, the lock keyword can be used to ensure that a thread has exclusive access to a certain resource.
  • VB.NET provides a SyncLock keyword for the same purpose of C#'s lock keyword.
  • Python does not provide a lock keyword, but it is possible to use a lower level mutex mechanism to acquire or release a lock.
  • Ruby also doesn't provide a keyword for synchronization, but it is possible to use an explicit low level mutex object.
  • In x86 Assembly, the LOCK prefix prevents another processor from doing anything in the middle of certain operations: it guarantees atomicity.
  • Objective-C provides the keyword "@synchronized" to put locks on blocks of code and also provides the classes NSLock, NSRecursiveLock, and NSConditionLock along with the NSLocking protocol for locking as well.
  • Ada is probably worth looking at too for a comprehensive overview, with its protected objects and rendezvous.

Read more about this topic:  Lock (computer Science)

Famous quotes containing the words language and/or support:

    “We might hypothetically possess ourselves of every technological resource on the North American continent, but as long as our language is inadequate, our vision remains formless, our thinking and feeling are still running in the old cycles, our process may be “revolutionary” but not transformative.”
    —Adrienne Rich (b. 1929)

    “A father ... knows exactly what those boys at the mall have in their depraved little minds because he once owned such a depraved little mind himself. In fact, if he thinks enough about the plans that he used to have for young girls, the father not only will support his wife in keeping their daughter home but he might even run over to the mall and have a few of those boys arrested.”
    —Bill Cosby (20th century)