Liouville's Theorem (complex Analysis) - Proof

Proof

The theorem follows from the fact that holomorphic functions are analytic. If f is an entire function, it can be represented by its Taylor series about 0:

where (by Cauchy's integral formula)


a_k = \frac{f^{(k)}(0)}{k!} = {1 \over 2 \pi i} \oint_{C_r}
\frac{f( \zeta )}{\zeta^{k+1}}\,d\zeta

and Cr is the circle about 0 of radius r > 0. Suppose f is bounded: i.e. there exists a constant M such that |f(z)| ≤ M for all z. We can estimate directly


| a_k |
\le \frac{1}{2 \pi} \oint_{C_r} \frac{ | f ( \zeta ) | }{ | \zeta |^{k+1} } \, |d\zeta|
\le \frac{1}{2 \pi} \oint_{C_r} \frac{ M }{ r^{k+1} } \, |d\zeta|
= \frac{M}{2 \pi r^{k+1}} \oint_{C_r} |d\zeta|
= \frac{M}{2 \pi r^{k+1}} 2 \pi r
= \frac{M}{r^k},

where in the second inequality we have used the fact that |z|=r on the circle Cr. But the choice of r in the above is an arbitrary positive number. Therefore, letting r tend to infinity (we let r tend to infinity since f is analytic on the entire plane) gives ak = 0 for all k ≥ 1. Thus f(z) = a0 and this proves the theorem.

Read more about this topic:  Liouville's Theorem (complex Analysis)

Famous quotes containing the word proof:

    In the reproof of chance
    Lies the true proof of men.
    William Shakespeare (1564–1616)

    War is a beastly business, it is true, but one proof we are human is our ability to learn, even from it, how better to exist.
    M.F.K. Fisher (1908–1992)

    a meek humble Man of modest sense,
    Who preaching peace does practice continence;
    Whose pious life’s a proof he does believe,
    Mysterious truths, which no Man can conceive.
    John Wilmot, 2d Earl Of Rochester (1647–1680)