Non-examples
- The set of rational numbers is not a linear continuum. Even though property b) is satisfied, property a) is not. Consider the subset:
-
- A = { x | x < √2 }
- of the set of rational numbers. Even though this set is bounded above by any rational number greater than √2 (for instance 3), it has no least upper bound in the rational numbers.
- The set of non-negative integers with its usual order is not a linear continuum. Property a) is satisfied (let A be a subset of the set of non-negative integers that is bounded above. Then A is finite so that it has a maximum. This maximum is the desired least upper bound of A). On the other hand, property b) is not. Indeed, 5 is a non-negative integer and so is 6, but there exists no non-negative integer that lies strictly between them.
- The ordered set A of nonzero real numbers:
-
- A = (-∞, 0) ∪ (0, +∞)
- is not a linear continuum. Property b) is trivially satisfied. However, if B is the set of negative real numbers:
-
- B = (-∞, 0)
- then B is a subset of A which is bounded above (by any element of A greater than 0; for instance 1), but has no least upper bound in B. Notice that 0 is not a bound for B since 0 is not an element of A.
- Let Z- denote the set of negative integers and let A = (0,5) ∪ (5,+∞). Let:
-
- S = Z- ∪ A
- Then S satisfies neither property a) nor property b). The proof is similar to the previous examples.
Read more about this topic: Linear Continuum