Lexicographical Order - Ordering of Sequences of Various Lengths

Ordering of Sequences of Various Lengths

Given a partially ordered set A, the above considerations allow to define naturally a lexicographical partial order over the free monoid A* formed by the set of all finite sequences of elements in A, with sequence concatenation as the monoid operation, as follows:

if
  • is a prefix of, or
  • and, where is the longest common prefix of and, and are members of A such that, and and are members of A*.

If < is a total order on A, then so is the lexicographic order A*. If A is a finite and totally ordered alphabet, A* is the set of all words over A, and we retrieve the notion of dictionary ordering used in lexicography that gave its name to the lexicographic orderings. However, in general this is not a well-order, even though it is on the alphabet A; for instance, if A = {a, b}, the language {anb | n ≥ 0} has no least element: ... aab ab b. A well-order for strings, based on the lexicographical order, is the shortlex order.

Similarly we can also compare a finite and an infinite string, or two infinite strings.

Comparing strings of different lengths can also be modeled as comparing strings of infinite length by right-padding finite strings with a special value that is less than any element of the alphabet.

This ordering is the ordering usually used to order character strings, including in dictionaries and indexes.

Read more about this topic:  Lexicographical Order

Famous quotes containing the words ordering of, ordering and/or lengths:

    Seeing then that truth consisteth in the right ordering of names in our affirmations, a man that seeketh precise truth, had need to remember what every name he uses stands for; and to place it accordingly; or else he will find himself entangled in words, as a bird in lime-twigs; the more he struggles, the more belimed.
    Thomas Hobbes (1579–1688)

    The national anthem belongs to the eighteenth century. In it you find us ordering God about to do our political dirty work.
    George Bernard Shaw (1856–1950)

    There seems to be no lengths to which humorless people will not go to analyze humor. It seems to worry them.
    Robert Benchley (1889–1945)