Numeration Systems Based On The Hyperoperation Sequence
R. L. Goodstein, with a system of notation different from Knuth arrows, used the sequence of hyperoperators here denoted by to create systems of numeration for the nonnegative integers. Letting superscripts denote the respective hyperoperators, the so-called complete hereditary representation of integer n, at level k and base b, can be expressed as follows using only the first k hyperoperators and using as digits only 0, 1, ..., b-1:
- For 0 ≤ n ≤ b-1, n is represented simply by the corresponding digit.
- For n > b-1, the representation of n is found recursively, first representing n in the form
- where xk, ..., x1 are the largest integers satisfying (in turn)
- ...
- .
- Any xi exceeding b-1 is then re-expressed in the same manner, and so on, repeating this procedure until the resulting form contains only the digits 0, 1, ..., b-1.
The remainder of this section will use, rather than superscripts, to denote the hyperoperators.
Unnecessary parentheses can be avoided by giving higher-level operators higher precedence in the order of evaluation; thus,
level-1 representations have the form, with X also of this form;
level-2 representations have the form, with X,Y also of this form;
level-3 representations have the form, with X,Y,Z also of this form;
level-4 representations have the form, with X,Y,Z,T also of this form;
and so on.
The representations can be abbreviated by omitting any instances of etc.; for example, the level-3 base-2 representation of the number 6 is, which abbreviates to .
Examples: The unique base-2 representations of the number 266, at levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are as follows:
- .
Read more about this topic: Knuth's Up-arrow Notation
Famous quotes containing the words systems, based and/or sequence:
“The geometry of landscape and situation seems to create its own systems of time, the sense of a dynamic element which is cinematising the events of the canvas, translating a posture or ceremony into dynamic terms. The greatest movie of the 20th century is the Mona Lisa, just as the greatest novel is Grays Anatomy.”
—J.G. (James Graham)
“What strikes many twin researchers now is not how much identical twins are alike, but rather how different they are, given the same genetic makeup....Multiples dont walk around in lockstep, talking in unison, thinking identical thoughts. The bond for normal twins, whether they are identical or fraternal, is based on how they, as individuals who are keenly aware of the differences between them, learn to relate to one another.”
—Pamela Patrick Novotny (20th century)
“It isnt that you subordinate your ideas to the force of the facts in autobiography but that you construct a sequence of stories to bind up the facts with a persuasive hypothesis that unravels your historys meaning.”
—Philip Roth (b. 1933)