Knuth's Up-arrow Notation - Numeration Systems Based On The Hyperoperation Sequence

Numeration Systems Based On The Hyperoperation Sequence

R. L. Goodstein, with a system of notation different from Knuth arrows, used the sequence of hyperoperators here denoted by to create systems of numeration for the nonnegative integers. Letting superscripts denote the respective hyperoperators, the so-called complete hereditary representation of integer n, at level k and base b, can be expressed as follows using only the first k hyperoperators and using as digits only 0, 1, ..., b-1:

  • For 0 ≤ nb-1, n is represented simply by the corresponding digit.
  • For n > b-1, the representation of n is found recursively, first representing n in the form
where xk, ..., x1 are the largest integers satisfying (in turn)
...
.
Any xi exceeding b-1 is then re-expressed in the same manner, and so on, repeating this procedure until the resulting form contains only the digits 0, 1, ..., b-1.

The remainder of this section will use, rather than superscripts, to denote the hyperoperators.

Unnecessary parentheses can be avoided by giving higher-level operators higher precedence in the order of evaluation; thus,

level-1 representations have the form, with X also of this form;

level-2 representations have the form, with X,Y also of this form;

level-3 representations have the form, with X,Y,Z also of this form;

level-4 representations have the form, with X,Y,Z,T also of this form;

and so on.

The representations can be abbreviated by omitting any instances of etc.; for example, the level-3 base-2 representation of the number 6 is, which abbreviates to .

Examples: The unique base-2 representations of the number 266, at levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are as follows:

.

Read more about this topic:  Knuth's Up-arrow Notation

Famous quotes containing the words systems, based and/or sequence:

    Our little systems have their day;
    They have their day and cease to be:
    They are but broken lights of thee,
    And thou, O Lord, art more than they.
    Alfred Tennyson (1809–1892)

    What strikes many twin researchers now is not how much identical twins are alike, but rather how different they are, given the same genetic makeup....Multiples don’t walk around in lockstep, talking in unison, thinking identical thoughts. The bond for normal twins, whether they are identical or fraternal, is based on how they, as individuals who are keenly aware of the differences between them, learn to relate to one another.
    Pamela Patrick Novotny (20th century)

    Reminiscences, even extensive ones, do not always amount to an autobiography.... For autobiography has to do with time, with sequence and what makes up the continuous flow of life. Here, I am talking of a space, of moments and discontinuities. For even if months and years appear here, it is in the form they have in the moment of recollection. This strange form—it may be called fleeting or eternal—is in neither case the stuff that life is made of.
    Walter Benjamin (1892–1940)