Election Results
| Canadian federal election, 2011 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±pp | Expenditures | |
| Conservative | Stephen Woodworth | 21,119 | 42.39 | +5.70 | – | |
| Liberal | Karen Redman | 15,592 | 31.30 | -4.64 | – | |
| New Democratic | Peter Thurley | 10,742 | 21.56 | +3.48 | $38,822.94 | |
| Green | Byron Williston | 1,972 | 3.95 | +1.06 | – | |
| Independent | Alan Rimmer | 199 | 0.39 | -0.08 | – | |
| Communist | Martin Suter | 93 | 0.19 | -0.09 | – | |
| Marxist–Leninist | Mark Corbiere | 92 | 0.18 | – | none listed | |
| Total valid votes/Expense limit | 49,809 | 100.00 | $87,274.51 | |||
| Total rejected ballots | 209 | 0.42 | +0.01 | |||
| Turnout | 50,018 | 63.13 | +6.10 | |||
| Eligible voters | 79,232 | – | – | |||
| Canadian federal election, 2008 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±pp | Expenditures | |
| Conservative | Stephen Woodworth | 16,480 | 36.69 | +4.56 | $75,291 | |
| Liberal | Karen Redman | 16,141 | 35.94 | -7.32 | $74,745 | |
| New Democratic | Oz Cole-Arnal | 8,152 | 18.08 | -0.35 | $26,622 | |
| Green | John Bithell | 3,818 | 8.51 | +2.89 | $2,612 | |
| Independent | Amanda Lamka | 215 | 0.47 | – | ||
| Communist | Martin Suter | 127 | 0.28 | -0.26 | $373 | |
| Total valid votes/Expense limit | 44,933 | 100.00 | $84,756 | |||
| Total rejected ballots | 183 | 0.41 | -0.05 | |||
| Turnout | 45,091 | 57.03 | -7.67 | |||
| Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +5.94 | ||||
| Canadian federal election, 2006 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±pp | ||
| Liberal | Karen Redman | 21,715 | 43.26 | -3.8 | ||
| Conservative | Steven Cage | 16,131 | 32.13 | +4.6 | ||
| New Democratic | Richard Walsh-Bowers | 9,250 | 18.43 | -0.9 | ||
| Green | Tony Maas | 2,822 | 5.62 | +0.2 | ||
| Communist | Martin Suter | 274 | 0.54 | |||
| Total valid votes | 50,192 | 100.00 | ||||
| Total rejected ballots | 232 | 0.46 | ||||
| Turnout | 50,426 | 64.70 | ||||
| Canadian federal election, 2004 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±pp | ||
| Liberal | Karen Redman | 21,264 | 47.1 | -5.7 | ||
| Conservative | Thomas Ichim | 12,412 | 27.5 | -12.4 | ||
| New Democratic | Richard Walsh-Bowers | 8,717 | 19.3 | +12.4 | ||
| Green | Karol Vesely | 2,450 | 5.4 | |||
| Independent | Mark Corbiere | 277 | 0.6 | |||
| Total valid votes | 45,120 | 100.0 | ||||
Note: Conservative vote is compared to the total of the Canadian Alliance vote and Progressive Conservative vote in 2000 election.
| Canadian federal election, 2000 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±pp | ||
| Liberal | Karen Redman | 23,511 | 52.8 | +4.8 | ||
| Alliance | Eloise Jantzi | 11,603 | 26.1 | +6.2 | ||
| Progressive Conservative | Steven Daniel Gadbois | 6,162 | 13.8 | -8.9 | ||
| New Democratic | Paul Royston | 3,058 | 6.9 | -2.5 | ||
| Communist | Martin Suter | 167 | 0.4 | |||
| Total valid votes | 44,501 | 100.0 | ||||
Note: Canadian Alliance vote is compared to the Reform vote in 1997 election.
| Canadian federal election, 1997 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |||
| Liberal | Karen Redman | 23,089 | 48.0 | |||
| Progressive Conservative | John Reimer | 10,960 | 22.8 | |||
| Reform | Ronald Albert Wilson | 9,550 | 19.9 | |||
| New Democratic | Lucy Harrison | 4,503 | 9.4 | |||
| Total valid votes | 48,102 | 100.0 | ||||
Read more about this topic: Kitchener Centre
Famous quotes containing the words election and/or results:
“Last evening attended Croghan Lodge International Order of Odd Fellows. Election of officers. Chosen Noble Grand. These social organizations have a number of good results. All who attend are educated in self-government. This in a marked way. They bind society together. The well-to-do and the poor should be brought together as much as possible. The separation into classes—castes—is our danger. It is the danger of all civilizations.”
—Rutherford Birchard Hayes (1822–1893)
“Different persons growing up in the same language are like different bushes trimmed and trained to take the shape of identical elephants. The anatomical details of twigs and branches will fulfill the elephantine form differently from bush to bush, but the overall outward results are alike.”
—Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)