Islamization of Knowledge - Modern Islamic Philosophy of Science

Modern Islamic Philosophy of Science

Modern Islamic philosophy has, in response to challenges of secular science and concerns that secular society is unwilling or unable to limit its uses of "dangerous technology", especially nuclear weapon or biotechnology, begun to look at the origins of science to determine what ethics or limits can or should be imposed, and what goals or visions are appropriate for science. Key figures in these debates are:

  • Ismail al-Faruqi who proposed an Islamization of knowledge.
  • Seyyed Hossein Nasr who focuses on interpretations of "khalifa".
  • Ziauddin Sardar who advocates the creation of a modern Islamic science to tackle problems facing Muslims today.
  • Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas who first coined the phrase "Islamization of contemporary knowledge".
  • Mohammad Najatuallah Siddiqui who focuses more specifically on Islamic economics.
  • F. Rosenthal, Knowledge Triumphant, explored the central importance of knowledge in Muslim civilization and explains how it generated "science". It is more a work of history. Also of some note in these debates have been
    • Nasim Butt, Science and Muslim Societies, an introduction
    • Ahmad Y. al-Hassan and Donald Routledge Hill, Islamic Technology: An Illustrated History

Read more about this topic:  Islamization Of Knowledge

Famous quotes containing the words modern, philosophy and/or science:

    The chief element in the art of statesmanship under modern conditions is the ability to elucidate the confused and clamorous interests which converge upon the seat of government. It is an ability to penetrate from the naïve self-interest of each group to its permanent and real interest.... Statesmanship ... consists in giving the people not what they want but what they will learn to want.
    Walter Lippmann (1889–1974)

    Irish? In truth I would not want to be anything else. It is a state of mind as well as an actual country. It is being at odds with other nationalities, having quite different philosophy about pleasure, about punishment, about life, and about death. At least it does not leave one pusillanimous.
    Edna O’Brien (b. c. 1932)

    “You are bothered, I suppose, by the idea that you can’t possibly believe in miracles and mysteries, and therefore can’t make a good wife for Hazard. You might just as well make yourself unhappy by doubting whether you would make a good wife to me because you can’t believe the first axiom in Euclid. There is no science which does not begin by requiring you to believe the incredible.”
    Henry Brooks Adams (1838–1918)