The Iron Hypothesis was formulated by oceanographer John Martin, based on theories by Joseph Hart and first tested in 1993. In 1988, Nature published the results of Martin's experiments as well as his speculations on climate change. It was hoped that fertilizing the oceans with iron would draw down atmospheric CO2.
Certain areas of the oceans have high levels of plant nutrients, such as nitrates and phosphates. However, the phytoplankton does not grow as strongly as it should, given the plentiful supply of sunlight and nutrients. John Martin argued that the lack of micronutrients, trace metals and particularly iron, was a limiting factor for growth of phytoplankton in HNLC (High Nitrate, Low Chlorophyll) ocean surface waters. Ken Johnson, Dick Barber and Kenneth Coale of the Moss Landing Marine Laboratories in Monterey Bay, California, were able to prove John Martin was correct, in a series of tests conducted near the Galápagos Islands in 1993 and again in 1995, with results published in Nature. By seeding or fertilizing the surface layer of the sea with fine particulates of iron, growth blooms of phytoplankton could be encouraged.
Read more about Iron Hypothesis: The Hypothesis
Famous quotes containing the words iron and/or hypothesis:
“Persistence can grind an iron beam down into a needle.”
—Chinese proverb.
“The hypothesis I wish to advance is that ... the language of morality is in ... grave disorder.... What we possess, if this is true, are the fragments of a conceptual scheme, parts of which now lack those contexts from which their significance derived. We possess indeed simulacra of morality, we continue to use many of the key expressions. But we have—very largely if not entirely—lost our comprehension, both theoretical and practical, of morality.”
—Alasdair Chalmers MacIntyre (b. 1929)