Inverse Problem For Lagrangian Mechanics - Background and Statement of The Problem

Background and Statement of The Problem

The usual set-up of Lagrangian mechanics on n-dimensional Euclidean space Rn is as follows. Consider a differentiable path u : → Rn. The action of the path u, denoted S(u), is given by

where L is a function of time, position and velocity known as the Lagrangian. The principle of least action states that, given an initial state x0 in Rn, the trajectory that the system determined by L will actually follow must be a minimizer of the action functional S satisfying the initial condition u(0) = x0. Furthermore, the critical points (and hence minimizers) of S must satisfy the Euler–Lagrange equations for S:

where the upper indices i denote the components of u = (u1, ..., un).

In the classical case

the Euler–Lagrange equations are the second-order ordinary differential equations better known as Newton's laws of motion:

The inverse problem of Lagrangian mechanics is as follows: given a system of second-order ordinary differential equations

that holds for times 0 ≤ tT, does there exist a Lagrangian L : × Rn × RnR for which these ordinary differential equations (E) are the Euler–Lagrange equations? In general, this problem is posed not on Euclidean space Rn, but on an n-dimensional manifold M, and the Lagrangian is a function L : × TMR, where TM denotes the tangent bundle of M.

Read more about this topic:  Inverse Problem For Lagrangian Mechanics

Famous quotes containing the words background and, background, statement and/or problem:

    I had many problems in my conduct of the office being contrasted with President Kennedy’s conduct in the office, with my manner of dealing with things and his manner, with my accent and his accent, with my background and his background. He was a great public hero, and anything I did that someone didn’t approve of, they would always feel that President Kennedy wouldn’t have done that.
    Lyndon Baines Johnson (1908–1973)

    Silence is the universal refuge, the sequel to all dull discourses and all foolish acts, a balm to our every chagrin, as welcome after satiety as after disappointment; that background which the painter may not daub, be he master or bungler, and which, however awkward a figure we may have made in the foreground, remains ever our inviolable asylum, where no indignity can assail, no personality can disturb us.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    No statement about God is simply, literally true. God is far more than can be measured, described, defined in ordinary language, or pinned down to any particular happening.
    David Jenkins (b. 1925)

    A curious thing about the ontological problem is its simplicity. It can be put in three Anglo-Saxon monosyllables: ‘What is there?’ It can be answered, moveover, in a word—‘Everything.’
    Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)