Structure of An ISBD Record
The ISBD prescribes eight areas of description. Each area, except area 7, is composed of multiple elements with structured classifications. Elements and areas that do not apply to a particular resource are omitted from the description. Standardized punctuation (colons, semicolons, slashes, dashes, commas, and periods) is used to identify and separate the elements and areas. The order of elements and standardized punctuation make it easier to interpret bibliographic records when one does not understand the language of the description.
- 1: title and statement of responsibility area, with the contents of
- 1.1 Title proper
- 1.2 General material designation. GMDs are generic terms describing the medium of the item.
- 1.3 Parallel title
- 1.4 Other title information
- 1.5 Statements of responsibility (authorship, editorship, etc.)
- 2: edition area
- 3: material or type of resource specific area (for example, the scale of a map or the numbering of a periodical)
- 4: publication, production, distribution, etc., area
- 5: physical description area (for example: number of pages in a book or number of CDs issued as a unit)
- 6: series area
- 7: notes area
- 8: resource identifier (e.g. ISBN, ISSN) and terms of availability area
ISBD(A) is governing the antiquarian bibliographic publications, which could apply to the ones in archeology, museum, antique auction or canonical texts etc.
Read more about this topic: International Standard Bibliographic Description
Famous quotes containing the words structure of, structure and/or record:
“I really do inhabit a system in which words are capable of shaking the entire structure of government, where words can prove mightier than ten military divisions.”
—Václav Havel (b. 1936)
“A committee is organic rather than mechanical in its nature: it is not a structure but a plant. It takes root and grows, it flowers, wilts, and dies, scattering the seed from which other committees will bloom in their turn.”
—C. Northcote Parkinson (19091993)
“Yesterday the Electoral Commission decided not to go behind the papers filed with the Vice-President in the case of Florida.... I read the arguments in the Congressional Record and cant see how lawyers can differ on the question. But the decision is by a strictly party voteeight Republicans against seven Democrats! It shows the strength of party ties.”
—Rutherford Birchard Hayes (18221893)