Effective Marginal Tax Rates
Because reductions of means tested benefits are additive, they can lead to a very high effective marginal tax rate of tax. For example, a person with children earning $95,000 could essentially be taxed 38% income tax plus 30% in loss of FTB-A, an effective marginal tax rate of 68%. If their partner earned $7,000 then their partner could pay an effective marginal tax rate of 30% loss of FTB-A, plus 20% loss of FTB-B, giving a total of 50%. If they earn $35,000 then their effective tax rate could be 30% income tax plus 30% loss of FTB-A plus 4% loss of low income rebate giving a total of 64%.
If other means tested allowances are payable (e.g. child care benefits, superannuation co-contribution, payments for a disability etc.) then the effective rate can be over 100%.
The means testing reflects a policy of targeting welfare to people in need. However, some argue that this creates a work disincentive for middle-class families. Further, Australia’s means-tested tax and spending programs are extraordinarily complex.
Read more about this topic: Income Tax In Australia
Famous quotes containing the words effective, marginal, tax and/or rates:
“As in political revolutions, so in paradigm choice—there is no standard higher than the assent of the relevant community. To discover how scientific revolutions are effected, we shall therefore have to examine not only the impact of nature and of logic, but also the techniques of persuasive argumentation effective within the quite special groups that constitute the community of scientists.”
—Thomas S. Kuhn (b. 1922)
“Most works of art are effectively treated as commodities and most artists, even when they justly claim quite other intentions, are effectively treated as a category of independent craftsmen or skilled workers producing a certain kind of marginal commodity.”
—Raymond Williams (1921–1988)
“In other words, a democratic government is the only one in which those who vote for a tax can escape the obligation to pay it.”
—Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859)
“In the U.S. for instance, the value of a homemaker’s productive work has been imputed mostly when she was maimed or killed and insurance companies and/or the courts had to calculate the amount to pay her family in damages. Even at that, the rates were mostly pink collar and the big number was attributed to the husband’s pain and suffering.”
—Gloria Steinem (20th century)