The Game
White: Bogdan Śliwa Black: David Bronstein Opening: ECO A81
1. d4 f5 2. g3 g6 3. Bg2 Bg7 4. Nc3 Nf6
- Both players have fianchettoed their bishops. If White had played the now-standard 4.c4 instead of 4.Nc3, the Leningrad variation of the Dutch Defence would have been reached.
5. Bg5 Nc6 6. Qd2 d6 7. h4 e6 8. 0-0-0 h6 9. Bf4 Bd7 10. e4 fxe4 11. Nxe4 Nd5 12. Ne2 Qe7 13. c4 Nb6?
- 13...Nxf4 14.Nxf4 Qf7
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
| 8 | 8 | ||||||||
| 7 | 7 | ||||||||
| 6 | 6 | ||||||||
| 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| 4 | 4 | ||||||||
| 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| 2 | 2 | ||||||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
14. c5! dxc5 15. Bxc7! 0-0 16. Bd6
- White wins the exchange by skewering Black's queen and rook.
16... Qf7 17. Bxf8 Rxf8 18. dxc5 Nd5 19. f4 Rd8 20. N2c3 Ndb4 21. Nd6 Qf8 22. Nxb7 Nd4!
- 22...Rb8 23.Qxd7+−
23. Nxd8 Bb5! (see diagram) 24. Nxe6!
- 24.Nxb5?! Qf5! ...
- 25.Nxd4?? Nxa2#
- 25.Qxb4?? Qc2#
- 25.Nc3?? Nxa2+! 26.Nxa2 Nb3#
- 25.Rde1?? Nxa2+ 26.Kd1 Qb1+ 27.Qc1 Qxc1#
- 25.b3 Qxc5+ 26.Kb1! (26.Nc3?? Ne2+! 27.Qxe2 Qxc3+ 28.Kb1 Qa1#) Qf5+ 27.Kc1! Qc5+ draws by perpetual check
- White can still probably win with 25.Qf2! Nxa2+ 26.Kd2 Nxb5 27.Ke1
|
|
24... Bd3! (see diagram) 25. Bd5!
- 25.Nxf8?? Nxa2+ 26.Nxa2 Nb3#
25... Qf5! 26. Nxd4+ Qxd5! (see diagram) 27. Nc2!
- 27.Nxd5?? Nxa2#
27... Bxc3 28. bxc3!
- 28.Qxc3?? Nxa2+ wins the queen.
28... Qxa2 29. cxb4!
- 29.Nxb4?? Qb1#
1–0
Read more about this topic: Immortal Losing Game
Famous quotes containing the word game:
“Vanessa wanted to be a ballerina. Dad had such hopes for her.... Corin was the academically brilliant one, and a fencer of Olympic standard. Everything was expected of them, and they fulfilled all expectations. But I was the one of whom nothing was expected. I remember a game the three of us played. Vanessa was the President of the United States, Corin was the British Prime Ministerand I was the royal dog.”
—Lynn Redgrave (b. 1943)
“Art is a concrete and personal and rather childish thing after allno matter what people do to graft it into science and make it sociological and psychological; it is no good at all unless it is let alone to be itselfa game of make-believe, or re-production, very exciting and delightful to people who have an ear for it or an eye for it.”
—Willa Cather (18731947)