Igor Platonov - Chess Results

Chess Results

Igor V. Platonov did not make a significant mark in competitive chess until 1958, when at age 24 he posted an even score of 6.5/13 in the Kiev Championship to tie 8th-9th places; the winner was Yuri Nikolaevsky. Later that same year, he scored 6.5/16 in the Ukrainian Championship at Kiev for 11th place; the winner was Efim Geller.

In the Spartak Club Championship, Minsk 1962, Platonov scored 8/17 for a tied 11th-13th place; the winner was Anatoly Bannik. He tied for the top place at the 1963 Kiev Championship with Efrim Lazarev, on 9.5/14. In the Ukrainian Championship, Kiev 1963, he scored 8/17 for a tied 13th-14th place, as Nikolaevsky won again. At the 1964 Trade Union Championship in Moscow, there were nine players who eventually became Grandmasters in the field, and Platonov scored 9/15 for a very impressive tied 3rd-4th place, as the winner was World Champion Tigran Petrosian. This was his best result so far.

Platonov qualified for his first Soviet final at Kharkov 1967 (URS-ch35), where the event was run on a Swiss format with more than 100 players. He finished well above the middle of the field; the winners were Mikhail Tal and Lev Polugaevsky. His performance was good enough to make the team for the USSR's match against Bulgaria, Sofia 1967. He also played for the USSR against Yugoslavia, Sochi 1968, scoring 1.5/4. In the Soviet final at Alma Ata 1968 (URS-ch36), he could only score 6.5/19 for 18th place, as Polugaevsky and Alexander Zaitsev won.

Platonov made his career best score in a Soviet final in the 1969 Zonal at Moscow (URS-ch37), where he finished with 12.5/22, to tie for 7th-9th places; the winners were Petrosian and Polugaevsky. He missed qualifying for the Interzonal by one point.

He got his first international tournament opportunity at Wijk aan Zee 1970, but found the company too strong, posting just 5.5/15 for a tied 12th-13th place, as Mark Taimanov won. He had to qualify for the next Soviet final, and was successful at Kiev 1970. In the final at Riga 1970 (URS-ch38), he finished 20th with 7.5/21, as Viktor Korchnoi won. Another successful qualification at Novosibirsk 1971 earned his place for the final at Leningrad 1971 (URS-ch39), where he was very respectable with 10/21 for a tied 12th-13th place, as Vladimir Savon won.

Platonov's next international chance was the José Raúl Capablanca Memorial at Cienfuegos 1972, where he had one of his best career results, placing 2nd with 13/19, behind only Anatoly Lein. This finish, together with his 1969 Soviet Championship result, earned him the Soviet Union Grandmaster title.

After that, he appeared less frequently in top events, his results dropped, and he did not manage to make another Soviet final, despite several attempts. His last high-class competitive games on file are from 1984.

Platonov broadened his opening repertoire in the late 1960s, and this led to greater success. He favoured the Sicilian Defence as Black against 1.e4, and was dangerous for even the best with this. He opened mainly with 1.e4 early in his career, but added closed games such as the Reti Opening as he matured, with success. Platonov scored wins over top Soviet players such as Mikhail Tal, Vasily Smyslov, Efim Geller, Leonid Stein, Vladimir Savon, Ratmir Kholmov, and Evgeni Vasiukov.

There is a selection of 230 of his games at chessgames.com; chessbase.com has 325 of his games, while mychess.com has 373 Platonov games. Many of these games would be repeated between sites.

Read more about this topic:  Igor Platonov

Famous quotes containing the words chess and/or results:

    There is a parallel between the twos and the tens. Tens are trying to test their abilities again, sizing up and experimenting to discover how to fit in. They don’t mean everything they do and say. They are just testing. . . . Take a good deal of your daughter’s behavior with a grain of salt. Try to handle the really outrageous as matter-of-factly as you would a mistake in grammar or spelling.
    —Stella Chess (20th century)

    How can you tell if you discipline effectively? Ask yourself if your disciplinary methods generally produce lasting results in a manner you find acceptable. Whether your philosophy is democratic or autocratic, whatever techniques you use—reasoning, a “star” chart, time-outs, or spanking—if it doesn’t work, it’s not effective.
    Stanley Turecki (20th century)