Identity Crisis (Marvel Comics) - Reading Order

Reading Order

Part 1 - Amazing Spider-Man (vol. 1) #434 - #435 (Ricochet identity; fast-talking criminal-for-hire who uses Spider-Man's agility to pose as a streetsmart athletic crook-for-hire with above-average strength and remarkable agility; battled Roughouse and Bloodscream in this identity, and fought side-by-side with Delilah to gain further information about new foe the Black Tarantula).

Part 2 - The Sensational Spider-Man #27 - #28 (Hornet identity, using a specially designed jet-pack, designed by Hobie Brown, and the Scarlet Spider's old sedative stingers, coupled with Spider-Man's typical strength; confronted the Looter and the Vulture in this costume, with the Vulture deducing his real identity as Spider-Man; was briefly confronted by the Human Torch, who warned him not to go after Spider-Man).

Part 3 - Peter Parker: Spider-Man #91 - #92 (Dusk identity, a dark, mysterious individual, using a costume from another dimension to blend in and out of shadows, as well as to glide; also uses Spider-Man's superhuman strength and spider-sense; battled the Shocker and formed a certain friendship with the Trapster using this persona, which enabled him to convince the criminal to admit to framing Spider-Man for a murder as a means of getting back at Norman Osborn).

Part 4 - The Spectacular Spider-Man #257 - #258 (Prodigy identity, an old-fashioned 'good guy' with superhuman strength and speed, able to leap from rooftop to rooftop, and using a bulletproof vest to appear even stronger; also included a fake nose and make-ups to increase the difference between him and Peter due to part of his face being exposed; battled Jack O'Lantern and Conundrum using this disguise, and provided faked evidence that the Spider-Man who attacked Norman Osborn was an impostor to clear his name of assault).

Read more about this topic:  Identity Crisis (Marvel Comics)

Famous quotes containing the words reading and/or order:

    To get time for civic work, for exercise, for neighborhood projects, reading or meditation, or just plain time to themselves, mothers need to hold out against the fairly recent but surprisingly entrenched myth that “good mothers” are constantly with their children. They will have to speak out at last about the demoralizing effect of spending day after day with small children, no matter how much they love them.
    —Wendy Coppedge Sanford. Ourselves and Our Children, by Boston Women’s Health Book Collective, introduction (1978)

    The general feeling was, and for a long time remained, that one had several children in order to keep just a few. As late as the seventeenth century . . . people could not allow themselves to become too attached to something that was regarded as a probable loss. This is the reason for certain remarks which shock our present-day sensibility, such as Montaigne’s observation, “I have lost two or three children in their infancy, not without regret, but without great sorrow.”
    Philippe Ariés (20th century)